From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail172.messagelabs.com (mail172.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.3]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D848B6B0071 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:01:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:01:46 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: zone state overhead In-Reply-To: <20101022184647.GH2160@csn.ul.ie> Message-ID: References: <20101014120804.8B8F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20101018103941.GX30667@csn.ul.ie> <20101019100658.A1B3.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20101019090803.GF30667@csn.ul.ie> <20101022141223.GF2160@csn.ul.ie> <20101022184647.GH2160@csn.ul.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Mel Gorman Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , Shaohua Li , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Andrew Morton , David Rientjes , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki List-ID: On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Mel Gorman wrote: > I considered it but thought the indirection would look tortured and > hinder review. If we agree on the basic premise, I would do it as two > patches. Would that suit? Sure. Aside from that small nitpick. Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org