From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C18A06B00A1 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:47:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 08:47:30 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [UnifiedV4 00/16] The Unified slab allocator (V4) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20101005185725.088808842@linux.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: David Rientjes Cc: Pekka Enberg , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, David Rientjes wrote: > Overall, the results are _much_ better than the vanilla slub allocator > that I frequently saw ~20% regressions with the TCP_RR netperf benchmark > on a couple of my machines with larger cpu counts. However, there still > is a significant performance degradation compared to slab. It seems that the memory leak is still present. This likely skews the results. Thought I had it fixed. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org