From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7EDDB6B0047 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:40:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:40:15 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: zone state overhead In-Reply-To: <20100928133059.GL8187@csn.ul.ie> Message-ID: References: <20100928050801.GA29021@sli10-conroe.sh.intel.com> <20100928133059.GL8187@csn.ul.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Mel Gorman Cc: Shaohua Li , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Mel Gorman wrote: > Which of these is better or is there an alternative suggestion on how > this livelock can be avoided? We need to run some experiments to see what is worse. Lets start by cutting both the stats threshold and the drift thing in half? > As a heads up, I'm preparing for exams at the moment and while I'm online, I'm > not in the position to prototype patches and test them at the moment but can > review alternative proposals if people have them. I'm also out early next week. Exams? You are finally graduating? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org