From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943056B02CF for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 19:14:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.93]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o7MNEh9g015910 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:14:43 -0700 Received: from pwj4 (pwj4.prod.google.com [10.241.219.68]) by wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o7MNEPjZ014424 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:14:42 -0700 Received: by pwj4 with SMTP id 4so1107644pwj.7 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:14:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:14:37 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes Subject: Re: [patch 2/3 v3] oom: avoid killing a task if a thread sharing its mm cannot be killed In-Reply-To: <20100822184526.600F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: References: <20100822184526.600F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Rik van Riel , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Sun, 22 Aug 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > This seems significantly cleaner than previous. Of cource, even though I need > to review [1/3] carefully. Unfortunatelly I'm very busy in this week, then > my responce might late a while. but it's not mean silinetly nak. > I agree, it's much better than making select_bad_process() turn out to be O(n^2) when no threads are OOM_DISABLE. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org