From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDEC06B01F1 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:01:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hpaq2.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq2.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.2]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o7JN1csD022827 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:01:38 -0700 Received: from pwj5 (pwj5.prod.google.com [10.241.219.69]) by hpaq2.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o7JN1ERC003431 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:01:37 -0700 Received: by pwj5 with SMTP id 5so1282943pwj.38 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:01:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:01:33 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes Subject: Re: [S+Q Cleanup3 4/6] slub: Dynamically size kmalloc cache allocations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20100819203324.549566024@linux.com> <20100819203438.745611155@linux.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Pekka Enberg , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Correct. Then we also do not need the sysfs_slab_add in > create_kmalloc_cache. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter This doesn't apply on top of this patchset, it was generated from the entire SLUB+Q patchset (we don't have __ALIEN_CACHE yet). Besides the conflicts, the patch is good. Acked-by: David Rientjes -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org