From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [S+Q Cleanup3 4/6] slub: Dynamically size kmalloc cache allocations
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:21:19 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008191405230.18994@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100819203438.745611155@linux.com>
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> @@ -2940,46 +2951,113 @@ static int slab_memory_callback(struct n
> * Basic setup of slabs
> *******************************************************************/
>
> +/*
> + * Used for early kmem_cache structures that were allocated using
> + * the page allocator
> + */
> +
> +static void __init kmem_cache_bootstrap_fixup(struct kmem_cache *s)
> +{
> + int node;
> +
> + list_add(&s->list, &slab_caches);
Since sysfs_slab_add() has been removed for kmem_cache and kmem_cache_node
here, they apparently don't need the __SYSFS_ADD_DEFERRED flag even though
we're waiting for the sysfs initcall since there's nothing that checks for
it. That bit can be removed, the last users of it were the dynamic DMA
cache support that was dropped in patch 2.
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-19 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-19 20:33 [S+Q Cleanup3 0/6] SLUB: Cleanups V3 Christoph Lameter
2010-08-19 20:33 ` [S+Q Cleanup3 1/6] Slub: Force no inlining of debug functions Christoph Lameter
2010-08-19 20:33 ` [S+Q Cleanup3 2/6] slub: remove dynamic dma slab allocation Christoph Lameter
2010-08-19 20:33 ` [S+Q Cleanup3 3/6] slub: Remove static kmem_cache_cpu array for boot Christoph Lameter
2010-08-19 20:33 ` [S+Q Cleanup3 4/6] slub: Dynamically size kmalloc cache allocations Christoph Lameter
2010-08-19 21:21 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2010-08-19 21:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-19 23:01 ` David Rientjes
2010-08-19 23:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-19 23:39 ` David Rientjes
2010-08-20 17:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-20 17:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-28 10:06 ` David Rientjes
2010-09-28 12:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-19 20:33 ` [S+Q Cleanup3 5/6] slub: Extract hooks for memory checkers from hotpaths Christoph Lameter
2010-08-19 21:02 ` David Rientjes
2010-08-19 20:33 ` [S+Q Cleanup3 6/6] slub: Move gfpflag masking out of the hotpath Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1008191405230.18994@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox