From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B3F6B02A5 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:31:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from kpbe17.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe17.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.81]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o6FKV41t021582 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:31:04 -0700 Received: from pxi10 (pxi10.prod.google.com [10.243.27.10]) by kpbe17.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o6FKV2vw026059 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:31:03 -0700 Received: by pxi10 with SMTP id 10so678684pxi.30 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:31:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:30:53 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes Subject: Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20100709190706.938177313@quilx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Pekka Enberg , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Piggin List-ID: On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > When running this patchset on two (client and server running > > netperf-2.4.5) four 2.2GHz quad-core AMD processors with 64GB of memory, > > here's the results: > > What is their NUMA topology? I dont have anything beyond two nodes here. > These two machines happen to have four 16GB nodes with asymmetrical distances: # cat /sys/devices/system/node/node*/distance 10 20 20 30 20 10 20 20 20 20 10 20 30 20 20 10 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org