From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73F7F600227 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:23:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:41:59 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [S+Q 08/16] slub: remove dynamic dma slab allocation In-Reply-To: <20100628113308.a9b6e834.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: References: <20100625212026.810557229@quilx.com> <20100625212105.765531312@quilx.com> <20100628113308.a9b6e834.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Pekka Enberg , linux-mm@kvack.org, Nick Piggin , Matt Mackall List-ID: On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > Uh...I think just using GFP_KERNEL drops too much > requests-from-user-via-gfp_mask. Sorry I do not understand what the issue is? The dma slabs are allocated while user space is not active yet. Please do not quote diff hunks that you do not comment on. I am on a slow link (vacation) and its awkward to check for comments... -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org