From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail191.messagelabs.com (mail191.messagelabs.com [216.82.242.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F3596B01B8 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:25:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:21:55 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [S+Q 00/16] SLUB with Queueing beats SLAB in hackbench In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20100625212026.810557229@quilx.com> <20100626022441.GC29809@laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Nick Piggin , linux-mm@kvack.org, Matt Mackall , David Rientjes , Mel Gorman List-ID: On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote: > I guess "netperf TCP_RR" is the most interesting one because that's a > known benchmark where SLUB performs poorly when compared to SLAB. > Mel's extensive slab benchmarks are also worth looking at: I will look at it when I get time but I am vacation right now and sitting in the hospital with my son who managed to get himself there on the first day of the "vacation". Guess it will take a week or so at least. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org