From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CAA686B01B2 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 06:15:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:12:32 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [S+Q 00/16] SLUB with Queueing beats SLAB in hackbench In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20100625212026.810557229@quilx.com> <20100626022441.GC29809@laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Nick Piggin , linux-mm@kvack.org, Matt Mackall List-ID: On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > Hackbench I don't think is that interesting. SLQB was beating SLAB > > too. > > We've seen regressions pop up with hackbench so I think it's > interesting. Not the most interesting one, for sure, nor conclusive. > Hackbench was frequently cited in performance tests. Which benchmarks would be of interest? I am off this week so dont expect a fast response from me. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org