From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
andi@firstfloor.org, lee.schermerhorn@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mempolicy: remove redundant check
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:35:17 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003161433560.10930@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268747703-8343-1-git-send-email-user@bob-laptop>
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Bob Liu wrote:
> From: Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>
>
> 1. Lee's patch "mempolicy: use MPOL_PREFERRED for system-wide
> default policy" has made the MPOL_DEFAULT only used in the
> memory policy APIs. So, no need to check in __mpol_equal also.
>
> 2. In policy_zonelist() mode MPOL_INTERLEAVE shouldn't happen,
> so fall through to BUG() instead of break to return.I also fix
> the comment.
>
These are two seperate functional changes, so you'll need to break them
out into individual patches.
> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/mempolicy.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index 643f66e..c4b16c9 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -1441,15 +1441,15 @@ static struct zonelist *policy_zonelist(gfp_t gfp, struct mempolicy *policy)
> /*
> * Normally, MPOL_BIND allocations are node-local within the
> * allowed nodemask. However, if __GFP_THISNODE is set and the
> - * current node is part of the mask, we use the zonelist for
> + * current node isn't part of the mask, we use the zonelist for
> * the first node in the mask instead.
> */
> if (unlikely(gfp & __GFP_THISNODE) &&
> unlikely(!node_isset(nd, policy->v.nodes)))
> nd = first_node(policy->v.nodes);
> break;
> - case MPOL_INTERLEAVE: /* should not happen */
> - break;
> + case MPOL_INTERLEAVE:
> + /* Should not happen, so fall through to BUG()*/
> default:
> BUG();
> }
Looks good.
> @@ -1806,7 +1806,7 @@ int __mpol_equal(struct mempolicy *a, struct mempolicy *b)
> return 0;
> if (a->mode != b->mode)
> return 0;
> - if (a->mode != MPOL_DEFAULT && !mpol_match_intent(a, b))
> + if (!mpol_match_intent(a, b))
> return 0;
> switch (a->mode) {
> case MPOL_BIND:
Ok. Could you also get rid of mpol_match_intent() and move its logic
directly into __mpol_equal() with the other comparison tests?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-16 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-16 13:55 Bob Liu
2010-03-16 21:35 ` David Rientjes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1003161433560.10930@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lliubbo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox