From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail172.messagelabs.com (mail172.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.3]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE996B0078 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:02:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from spaceape8.eur.corp.google.com (spaceape8.eur.corp.google.com [172.28.16.142]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o2301nSS020405 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 00:01:49 GMT Received: from fxm28 (fxm28.prod.google.com [10.184.13.28]) by spaceape8.eur.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o2301mbr019948 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:01:48 -0800 Received: by fxm28 with SMTP id 28so161500fxm.19 for ; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:01:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:01:41 -0800 (PST) From: David Rientjes Subject: Re: [patch -mm v2 04/10] oom: remove special handling for pagefault ooms In-Reply-To: <20100302085532.ff9d3cf4.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: References: <20100301052306.GG19665@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20100302085532.ff9d3cf4.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Balbir Singh , Andrew Morton , Rik van Riel , Nick Piggin , KOSAKI Motohiro , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > Kame said earlier it would be no problem to rebase his memcg oom work on > > mmotm if my patches were merged. > > > > But I also said this patch cause regression. This patch causes a regression??? You never said that in any of your reviews and I have no idea what you're talking about, this patch simply cleans up the code and closes a race where VM_FAULT_OOM could needlessly kill tasks in parallel oom conditions. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org