linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@suse.cz>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm 4/9 v2] oom: remove compulsory panic_on_oom mode
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:58:05 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1002161756100.15079@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1002161648570.31753@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, David Rientjes wrote:

> Ok, I'll eliminate pagefault_out_of_memory() and get it to use 
> out_of_memory() by only checking for constrained_alloc() when
> gfp_mask != 0.
> 

What do you think about making pagefaults use out_of_memory() directly and 
respecting the sysctl_panic_on_oom settings?

This removes the check for a parallel memcg oom killing since we can 
guarantee that's not going to happen if we take ZONE_OOM_LOCKED for all 
populated zones (nobody is currently executing the oom killer) and no 
tasks have TIF_MEMDIE set.

Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -124,7 +124,6 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_disabled(void)
 	return false;
 }
 
-extern bool mem_cgroup_oom_called(struct task_struct *task);
 void mem_cgroup_update_file_mapped(struct page *page, int val);
 unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(struct zone *zone, int order,
 						gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
@@ -258,11 +257,6 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_disabled(void)
 	return true;
 }
 
-static inline bool mem_cgroup_oom_called(struct task_struct *task)
-{
-	return false;
-}
-
 static inline int
 mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -200,7 +200,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
 	 * Should the accounting and control be hierarchical, per subtree?
 	 */
 	bool use_hierarchy;
-	unsigned long	last_oom_jiffies;
 	atomic_t	refcnt;
 
 	unsigned int	swappiness;
@@ -1234,34 +1233,6 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
 	return total;
 }
 
-bool mem_cgroup_oom_called(struct task_struct *task)
-{
-	bool ret = false;
-	struct mem_cgroup *mem;
-	struct mm_struct *mm;
-
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	mm = task->mm;
-	if (!mm)
-		mm = &init_mm;
-	mem = mem_cgroup_from_task(rcu_dereference(mm->owner));
-	if (mem && time_before(jiffies, mem->last_oom_jiffies + HZ/10))
-		ret = true;
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-	return ret;
-}
-
-static int record_last_oom_cb(struct mem_cgroup *mem, void *data)
-{
-	mem->last_oom_jiffies = jiffies;
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static void record_last_oom(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
-{
-	mem_cgroup_walk_tree(mem, NULL, record_last_oom_cb);
-}
-
 /*
  * Currently used to update mapped file statistics, but the routine can be
  * generalized to update other statistics as well.
@@ -1549,10 +1520,8 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		}
 
 		if (!nr_retries--) {
-			if (oom) {
+			if (oom)
 				mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask);
-				record_last_oom(mem_over_limit);
-			}
 			goto nomem;
 		}
 	}
@@ -2408,8 +2377,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
 
 /*
  * A call to try to shrink memory usage on charge failure at shmem's swapin.
- * Calling hierarchical_reclaim is not enough because we should update
- * last_oom_jiffies to prevent pagefault_out_of_memory from invoking global OOM.
  * Moreover considering hierarchy, we should reclaim from the mem_over_limit,
  * not from the memcg which this page would be charged to.
  * try_charge_swapin does all of these works properly.
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -490,29 +490,6 @@ static int oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
 	return oom_kill_task(victim);
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
-void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t gfp_mask)
-{
-	unsigned long points = 0;
-	struct task_struct *p;
-
-	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
-retry:
-	p = select_bad_process(&points, mem, CONSTRAINT_NONE, NULL);
-	if (PTR_ERR(p) == -1UL)
-		goto out;
-
-	if (!p)
-		p = current;
-
-	if (oom_kill_process(p, gfp_mask, 0, points, mem,
-				"Memory cgroup out of memory"))
-		goto retry;
-out:
-	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
-}
-#endif
-
 static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(oom_notify_list);
 
 int register_oom_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
@@ -578,6 +555,70 @@ void clear_zonelist_oom(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 }
 
 /*
+ * Try to acquire the oom killer lock for all system zones.  Returns zero if a
+ * parallel oom killing is taking place, otherwise locks all zones and returns
+ * non-zero.
+ */
+static int try_set_system_oom(void)
+{
+	struct zone *zone;
+	int ret = 1;
+
+	spin_lock(&zone_scan_lock);
+	for_each_populated_zone(zone)
+		if (zone_is_oom_locked(zone)) {
+			ret = 0;
+			goto out;
+		}
+	for_each_populated_zone(zone)
+		zone_set_flag(zone, ZONE_OOM_LOCKED);
+out:
+	spin_unlock(&zone_scan_lock);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Clears ZONE_OOM_LOCKED for all system zones so that failed allocation
+ * attempts or page faults may now recall the oom killer, if necessary.
+ */
+static void clear_system_oom(void)
+{
+	struct zone *zone;
+
+	spin_lock(&zone_scan_lock);
+	for_each_populated_zone(zone)
+		zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_OOM_LOCKED);
+	spin_unlock(&zone_scan_lock);
+}
+
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
+void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t gfp_mask)
+{
+	unsigned long points = 0;
+	struct task_struct *p;
+
+	if (!try_set_system_oom())
+		return;
+	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+retry:
+	p = select_bad_process(&points, mem, CONSTRAINT_NONE, NULL);
+	if (PTR_ERR(p) == -1UL)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (!p)
+		p = current;
+
+	if (oom_kill_process(p, gfp_mask, 0, points, mem,
+				"Memory cgroup out of memory"))
+		goto retry;
+out:
+	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+	clear_system_oom();
+}
+#endif
+
+/*
  * Must be called with tasklist_lock held for read.
  */
 static void __out_of_memory(gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
@@ -612,46 +653,9 @@ retry:
 		goto retry;
 }
 
-/*
- * pagefault handler calls into here because it is out of memory but
- * doesn't know exactly how or why.
- */
-void pagefault_out_of_memory(void)
-{
-	unsigned long freed = 0;
-
-	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&oom_notify_list, 0, &freed);
-	if (freed > 0)
-		/* Got some memory back in the last second. */
-		return;
-
-	/*
-	 * If this is from memcg, oom-killer is already invoked.
-	 * and not worth to go system-wide-oom.
-	 */
-	if (mem_cgroup_oom_called(current))
-		goto rest_and_return;
-
-	if (sysctl_panic_on_oom)
-		panic("out of memory from page fault. panic_on_oom is selected.\n");
-
-	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
-	/* unknown gfp_mask and order */
-	__out_of_memory(0, 0, CONSTRAINT_NONE, NULL);
-	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
-
-	/*
-	 * Give "p" a good chance of killing itself before we
-	 * retry to allocate memory.
-	 */
-rest_and_return:
-	if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))
-		schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
-}
-
 /**
  * out_of_memory - kill the "best" process when we run out of memory
- * @zonelist: zonelist pointer
+ * @zonelist: zonelist pointer passed to page allocator
  * @gfp_mask: memory allocation flags
  * @order: amount of memory being requested as a power of 2
  * @nodemask: nodemask passed to page allocator
@@ -665,7 +669,7 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 		int order, nodemask_t *nodemask)
 {
 	unsigned long freed = 0;
-	enum oom_constraint constraint;
+	enum oom_constraint constraint = CONSTRAINT_NONE;
 
 	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&oom_notify_list, 0, &freed);
 	if (freed > 0)
@@ -681,7 +685,8 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 	 * Check if there were limitations on the allocation (only relevant for
 	 * NUMA) that may require different handling.
 	 */
-	constraint = constrained_alloc(zonelist, gfp_mask, nodemask);
+	if (zonelist)
+		constraint = constrained_alloc(zonelist, gfp_mask, nodemask);
 	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
 	if (unlikely(sysctl_panic_on_oom)) {
 		/*
@@ -691,6 +696,7 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 		 */
 		if (constraint == CONSTRAINT_NONE) {
 			dump_header(NULL, gfp_mask, order, NULL);
+			read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
 			panic("Out of memory: panic_on_oom is enabled\n");
 		}
 	}
@@ -704,3 +710,17 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 	if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))
 		schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
 }
+
+/*
+ * The pagefault handler calls here because it is out of memory, so kill a
+ * memory-hogging task.  If a populated zone has ZONE_OOM_LOCKED set, a parallel
+ * oom killing is already in progress so do nothing.  If a task is found with
+ * TIF_MEMDIE set, it has been killed so do nothing and allow it to exit.
+ */
+void pagefault_out_of_memory(void)
+{
+	if (!try_set_system_oom())
+		return;
+	out_of_memory(NULL, 0, 0, NULL);
+	clear_system_oom();
+}

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-17  1:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-15 22:19 [patch -mm 0/9 v2] oom killer rewrite David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 1/9 v2] oom: filter tasks not sharing the same cpuset David Rientjes
2010-02-16  6:14   ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 2/9 v2] oom: sacrifice child with highest badness score for parent David Rientjes
2010-02-16  6:15   ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 3/9 v2] oom: select task from tasklist for mempolicy ooms David Rientjes
2010-02-23  6:31   ` Balbir Singh
2010-02-23  8:17     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 4/9 v2] oom: remove compulsory panic_on_oom mode David Rientjes
2010-02-16  0:00   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16  0:14     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16  0:23       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16  9:02         ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16 23:42           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16 23:54             ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17  0:01               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17  0:31                 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17  0:41                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17  0:54                     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17  1:03                       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17  1:58                       ` David Rientjes [this message]
2010-02-17  2:13                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17  2:23                           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17  2:37                             ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17  2:28                           ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17  2:34                             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17  2:58                               ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17  3:21                                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17  9:11                                   ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17  9:52                                     ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-17 22:04                                       ` David Rientjes
2010-02-22  5:31                               ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-02-22  6:15                                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-22 11:42                                   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-02-22 20:59                                     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-22 23:51                                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-22 20:55                                   ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17  2:19                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-16  6:20   ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16  6:59     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16  7:20       ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16  7:53         ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16  8:08           ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16  8:10             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16  8:42             ` David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 5/9 v2] oom: badness heuristic rewrite David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 6/9 v2] oom: deprecate oom_adj tunable David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:28   ` Alan Cox
2010-02-15 22:35     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 7/9 v2] oom: replace sysctls with quick mode David Rientjes
2010-02-16  6:28   ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16  8:58     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 8/9 v2] oom: avoid oom killer for lowmem allocations David Rientjes
2010-02-15 23:57   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16  0:10     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16  0:21       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16  1:13         ` [patch] mm: add comment about deprecation of __GFP_NOFAIL David Rientjes
2010-02-16  1:26           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-16  7:03             ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16  7:23               ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16  5:32       ` [patch -mm 8/9 v2] oom: avoid oom killer for lowmem allocations KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-16  7:29         ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16  6:44       ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16  7:41         ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16  7:53           ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-16  8:25             ` David Rientjes
2010-02-16 23:48               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17  0:03                 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-17  0:03                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-17  0:21                     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-23 11:24                       ` Balbir Singh
2010-02-23 21:12                         ` David Rientjes
2010-02-15 22:20 ` [patch -mm 9/9 v2] oom: remove unnecessary code and cleanup David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1002161756100.15079@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=l.lunak@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox