From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: submit@firstfloor.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
haicheng.li@intel.com, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [1/4] SLAB: Handle node-not-up case in fallback_alloc()
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 14:31:07 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1002061418590.23073@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100206155624.GA2777@one.firstfloor.org>
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > If a hot-added node has not been initialized for the cache, your code is
> > picking an existing one in zonelist order which may be excluded by
> > current's cpuset. Thus, your code has a very real chance of having
> > kmem_getpages() return NULL because get_page_from_freelist() will reject
> > non-atomic ALLOC_CPUSET allocations for prohibited nodes. That isn't a
> > scenario that requires a "funny cpuset," it just has to not allow whatever
> > initialized node comes first in the zonelist.
>
> The point was that you would need to run whoever triggers the memory
> hotadd in a cpuset with limitations. That would be a clear
> don't do that if hurts(tm)
>
With a subset of memory nodes, yes. What else prohibits that except for
your new code?
There's a second issue with this approach that I eluded to above: you're
picking the first initialized node for the cache based solely on whether
it is allocated or not. kmem_getpages() may still return NULL when it
would return new slab for any other initialized node, so you're better off
trying them all.
In other words, my earlier (untested) suggestion:
diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -3172,6 +3172,7 @@ static void *fallback_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cache, gfp_t flags)
gfp_t local_flags;
struct zoneref *z;
struct zone *zone;
+ nodemask_t allowed_nodes = NODE_MASK_NONE;
enum zone_type high_zoneidx = gfp_zone(flags);
void *obj = NULL;
int nid;
@@ -3197,6 +3198,7 @@ retry:
flags | GFP_THISNODE, nid);
if (obj)
break;
+ node_set(nid, allowed_nodes);
}
}
@@ -3210,7 +3212,15 @@ retry:
if (local_flags & __GFP_WAIT)
local_irq_enable();
kmem_flagcheck(cache, flags);
- obj = kmem_getpages(cache, local_flags, numa_node_id());
+ nid = numa_node_id();
+ if (cache->nodelists[nid])
+ obj = kmem_getpages(cache, local_flags, nid);
+ else
+ for_each_node_mask(nid, allowed_nodes) {
+ obj = kmem_getpages(cache, local_flags, nid);
+ if (obj)
+ break;
+ }
if (local_flags & __GFP_WAIT)
local_irq_disable();
if (obj) {
Anyway, I'll leave these otherwise unnecessary limitations to Pekka.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-06 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-03 21:39 [PATCH] [0/4] SLAB: Fix a couple of slab memory hotadd issues Andi Kleen
2010-02-03 21:39 ` [PATCH] [1/4] SLAB: Handle node-not-up case in fallback_alloc() Andi Kleen
2010-02-05 21:06 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-06 7:25 ` Andi Kleen
2010-02-06 9:53 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-06 15:56 ` Andi Kleen
2010-02-06 22:31 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2010-02-03 21:39 ` [PATCH] [2/4] SLAB: Set up the l3 lists for the memory of freshly added memory Andi Kleen
2010-02-05 19:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-02-05 21:17 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-06 7:26 ` Andi Kleen
2010-02-06 9:47 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-03 21:39 ` [PATCH] [3/4] SLAB: Separate node initialization into separate function Andi Kleen
2010-02-05 19:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-02-05 21:29 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-06 7:27 ` Andi Kleen
2010-02-06 9:55 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-03 21:39 ` [PATCH] [4/4] SLAB: Fix node add timer race in cache_reap Andi Kleen
2010-02-05 19:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-02-05 8:27 ` [PATCH] [0/4] SLAB: Fix a couple of slab memory hotadd issues Pekka Enberg
2010-02-05 19:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-02-05 20:22 ` Andi Kleen
2010-02-05 20:55 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1002061418590.23073@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=haicheng.li@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=submit@firstfloor.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox