From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail172.messagelabs.com (mail172.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.3]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3533B6B003D for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:35:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:35:02 -0600 (CST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC mm][PATCH 4/5] add a lowmem check function In-Reply-To: <20091211093938.70214f9c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: References: <20091210163115.463d96a3.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091210170036.dde2c147.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091211093938.70214f9c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , minchan.kim@gmail.com, Ingo Molnar , Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com List-ID: On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > Hmm, How about adding following kind of patch after this > > #define policy_zone (lowmem_zone + 1) > > and remove policy_zone ? I think the name of "policy_zone" implies > "this is for mempolicy, NUMA" and don't think good name for generic use. Good idea but lets hear Lee's opinion about this one too. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org