From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail172.messagelabs.com (mail172.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.3]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766AA6B004F for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:53:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from spaceape9.eur.corp.google.com (spaceape9.eur.corp.google.com [172.28.16.143]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n7ENrNpc022951 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:53:24 -0700 Received: from pxi14 (pxi14.prod.google.com [10.243.27.14]) by spaceape9.eur.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n7ENrJ5E031405 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:53:20 -0700 Received: by pxi14 with SMTP id 14so549773pxi.19 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:53:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:53:16 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] hugetlb: add per node hstate attributes In-Reply-To: <20090814160830.e301d68a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: References: <20090729181139.23716.85986.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20090729181205.23716.25002.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <9ec263480907301239i4f6a6973m494f4b44770660dc@mail.gmail.com> <20090731103632.GB28766@csn.ul.ie> <1249067452.4674.235.camel@useless.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20090814160830.e301d68a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Lee Schermerhorn , Mel Gorman , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , nacc@us.ibm.com, Andi Kleen , agl@us.ibm.com, apw@canonical.com, eric.whitney@hp.com List-ID: On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:38:43 -0700 (PDT) > David Rientjes wrote: > > > Andrew, Lee, what's the status of this patchset? > > All forgotten about as far as I'm concerned. It was v1, it had "rfc" > in there and had an "Ick, no, please don't do that" from Greg. I > assume Greg's OK with the fixed-up version. > > I think Greg's concerns were addressed in the latest revision of the patchset, specifically http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124906676520398. Maybe the more appropriate question to ask is if Mel has any concerns about adding the per-node hstate attributes either as a substitution or as a complement to the mempolicy-based allocation approach. Mel? Lee, do you have plans to resend the patchset including the modified kobj handling? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org