linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm v2] mm: introduce oom_adj_child
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:06:38 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907292356410.5581@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090730090855.E415.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:

> > diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> > --- a/kernel/fork.c
> > +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> > @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ static struct mm_struct * mm_init(struct mm_struct * mm, struct task_struct *p)
> >  	init_rwsem(&mm->mmap_sem);
> >  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mm->mmlist);
> >  	mm->flags = (current->mm) ? current->mm->flags : default_dump_filter;
> > -	mm->oom_adj = (current->mm) ? current->mm->oom_adj : 0;
> > +	mm->oom_adj = p->oom_adj_child;
> 
> This code doesn't fix anything.
> mm->oom_adj assignment still change vfork() parent process oom_adj value.
> (Again, vfork() parent and child use the same mm)
> 

That's because the oom killer only really considers the highest oom_adj 
value amongst all threads that share the same mm.  Allowing those threads 
to each have different oom_adj values leads (i) to an inconsistency in 
reporting /proc/pid/oom_score for how the oom killer selects a task to 
kill and (ii) the oom killer livelock that it fixes when one thread 
happens to be OOM_DISABLE.

So, yes, changing the oom_adj value for a thread may have side-effects 
on other threads that didn't exist prior to 2.6.31-rc1 because the oom_adj 
value now represents a killable quantity of memory instead of a being a 
characteristic of the task itself.  But we now provide the inheritance 
property in a new way, via /proc/pid/oom_adj_child, that gives you all the 
functionality that the previous way did but without the potential for 
livelock.

> IOW, in vfork case, oom_adj_child parameter doesn't only change child oom_adj,
> but also parent oom_adj value.

Changing oom_adj_child for a task never changes oom_adj for any mm, it 
simply specifies what default value shall be given for a child's newly 
initialized mm.  Chaning oom_adj, on the other hand, will 

> IOW, oom_adj_child is NOT child effective parameter.
> 

It's not meant to be, it's only meant to specify a default value for newly 
initialized mm's of its descendants.  What happens after that is governed 
completely by the child's own /proc/pid/oom_adj.  That's pretty clearly 
explained in Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-30  7:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-29  4:27 David Rientjes
2009-07-29 23:13 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-29 23:25   ` Paul Menage
2009-07-30  2:32 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-30  7:06   ` David Rientjes [this message]
2009-07-31  6:47     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-31  9:31       ` David Rientjes
2009-08-03 11:58         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-03 12:12           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-30  9:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-30  9:31   ` David Rientjes
2009-07-30 10:02     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-30 19:05       ` David Rientjes
2009-07-31  0:33         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-31  6:50           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-31 19:38             ` David Rientjes
2009-08-03 12:16               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-31  9:36           ` David Rientjes
2009-07-31 10:49             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-31 19:18               ` David Rientjes
2009-08-01  1:10                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-01 20:26                   ` David Rientjes
2009-08-03  1:42                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-03  7:59                       ` David Rientjes
2009-08-03  8:02                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-03  8:08                           ` David Rientjes
2009-08-03  8:45                             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-03  8:55                               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-03 12:19                                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-03 12:32                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-03 12:21                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-03 16:17                     ` Paul Menage

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.0907292356410.5581@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox