From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2970D6B0093 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:14:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:14:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Justin Piszcz Subject: Re: What to do with this message (2.6.30.1) ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20090713134621.124aa18e.skraw@ithnet.com> <4807377b0907132240g6f74c9cbnf1302d354a0e0a72@mail.gmail.com> <20090715084754.36ff73bf.skraw@ithnet.com> <20090715113740.334309dd.skraw@ithnet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: David Rientjes Cc: Stephan von Krawczynski , Jesse Brandeburg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" List-ID: On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, David Rientjes wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > >>> If you have some additional time, it would also be helpful to get a >>> bisection of when the problem started occurring (it appears to be sometime >>> between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30). >> >> Do you know what version should definitely be not affected? I can check one >> kernel version per day, can you name a list which versions to check out? >> > > To my knowledge, this issue was never reported on 2.6.29, so that should > be a sane starting point. > After talking to Stephan offline-- I am also using the Intel e1000e for my primary network interface to the LAN, I suppose this is the culprit? I have both options compiled in e1000 and e1000e as I have Intel 1Gbps PCI nics as well.. I am thinking back now and before the introduction of e1000e I do not recall seeing any issues, perhaps this is it? Justin. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org