From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
aarcange@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
minchan.kim@gmail.com, rientjes@google.com,
vedran.furac@gmail.com,
"hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk" <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC][-mm][PATCH 1/6] oom-killer: updates for classification of OOM
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:05:09 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0911021159120.2028@V090114053VZO-1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091102162412.107ff8ac.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> /*
> - * Types of limitations to the nodes from which allocations may occur
> + * Types of limitations to zones from which allocations may occur
> */
"Types of limitations that may cause OOMs"? MEMCG limitations are not zone
based.
> */
>
> -unsigned long badness(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long uptime)
> +static unsigned long __badness(struct task_struct *p,
> + unsigned long uptime, enum oom_constraint constraint,
> + struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> {
> unsigned long points, cpu_time, run_time;
> struct mm_struct *mm;
Why rename this function? You are adding a global_badness anyways.
> + /*
> + * In numa environ, almost all allocation will be against NORMAL zone.
The typical allocations will be against the policy_zone! SGI IA64 (and
others) have policy_zone == GFP_DMA.
> + * But some small area, ex)GFP_DMA for ia64 or GFP_DMA32 for x86-64
> + * can cause OOM. We can use policy_zone for checking lowmem.
> + */
Simply say that we are checking if the zone constraint is below the policy
zone?
> + * Now, only mempolicy specifies nodemask. But if nodemask
> + * covers all nodes, this oom is global oom.
> + */
> + if (nodemask && !nodes_equal(node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY], *nodemask))
> + ret = CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY;
Huh? A cpuset can also restrict the nodes?
> + /*
> + * If not __GFP_THISNODE, zonelist containes all nodes. And if
Dont see any __GFP_THISNODE checks here.
> panic("out of memory from page fault. panic_on_oom is selected.\n");
>
> read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> - __out_of_memory(0, 0); /* unknown gfp_mask and order */
> + /*
> + * Considering nature of pages required for page-fault,this must be
> + * global OOM (if not cpuset...). Then, CONSTRAINT_NONE is correct.
> + * zonelist, nodemasks are unknown...
> + */
> + __out_of_memory(0, CONSTRAINT_NONE, 0, NULL);
> read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
Page faults can occur on processes that have memory restrictions.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-02 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-02 7:22 [RFC][-mm][PATCH 0/6] oom-killer: total renewal KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-02 7:24 ` [RFC][-mm][PATCH 1/6] oom-killer: updates for classification of OOM KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-02 17:05 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2009-11-02 23:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-03 20:18 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-04 0:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-02 7:25 ` [RFC][-mm][PATCH 2/6] oom-killer: count swap usage per process KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-02 17:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-11-02 23:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-03 19:47 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-04 0:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-02 7:26 ` [RFC][-mm][PATCH 3/6] oom-killer: count lowmem rss KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-02 17:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-11-02 23:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-03 20:24 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-04 0:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-02 7:27 ` [RFC][-mm][PATCH 4/6] oom-killer: fork bomb detector KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-02 8:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-02 7:28 ` [RFC][-mm][PATCH 5/6] oom-killer: check last total_vm expansion KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-03 20:29 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-04 0:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-02 7:30 ` [RFC][-mm][PATCH 6/6] oom-killer: rewrite badness KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-02 15:04 ` [RFC][-mm][PATCH 0/6] oom-killer: total renewal Minchan Kim
2009-11-02 15:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-03 20:34 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-03 23:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.1.10.0911021159120.2028@V090114053VZO-1 \
--to=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vedran.furac@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox