From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
linuxram@us.ibm.com, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Do not unconditionally treat zones that fail zone_reclaim() as full
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:48:53 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906110948080.29827@gentwo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244717273-15176-3-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie>
It needs to be mentioned that this fixes a bug introduced in 2.6.19.
Possibly a portion of this code needs to be backported to stable.
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On NUMA machines, the administrator can configure zone_reclaim_mode that
> is a more targetted form of direct reclaim. On machines with large NUMA
> distances for example, a zone_reclaim_mode defaults to 1 meaning that clean
> unmapped pages will be reclaimed if the zone watermarks are not being
> met. The problem is that zone_reclaim() failing at all means the zone
> gets marked full.
>
> This can cause situations where a zone is usable, but is being skipped
> because it has been considered full. Take a situation where a large tmpfs
> mount is occuping a large percentage of memory overall. The pages do not
> get cleaned or reclaimed by zone_reclaim(), but the zone gets marked full
> and the zonelist cache considers them not worth trying in the future.
>
> This patch makes zone_reclaim() return more fine-grained information about
> what occured when zone_reclaim() failued. The zone only gets marked full if
> it really is unreclaimable. If it's a case that the scan did not occur or
> if enough pages were not reclaimed with the limited reclaim_mode, then the
> zone is simply skipped.
>
> There is a side-effect to this patch. Currently, if zone_reclaim()
> successfully reclaimed SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, an allocation attempt would
> go ahead. With this patch applied, zone watermarks are rechecked after
> zone_reclaim() does some work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> Reviewed-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> mm/internal.h | 4 ++++
> mm/page_alloc.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> mm/vmscan.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> index f02c750..f290c4d 100644
> --- a/mm/internal.h
> +++ b/mm/internal.h
> @@ -259,4 +259,8 @@ int __get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
> unsigned long start, int len, int flags,
> struct page **pages, struct vm_area_struct **vmas);
>
> +#define ZONE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN -2
> +#define ZONE_RECLAIM_FULL -1
> +#define ZONE_RECLAIM_SOME 0
> +#define ZONE_RECLAIM_SUCCESS 1
> #endif
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index d35e753..667ffbb 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1477,15 +1477,33 @@ zonelist_scan:
> BUILD_BUG_ON(ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS < NR_WMARK);
> if (!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS)) {
> unsigned long mark;
> + int ret;
> +
> mark = zone->watermark[alloc_flags & ALLOC_WMARK_MASK];
> - if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, mark,
> - classzone_idx, alloc_flags)) {
> - if (!zone_reclaim_mode ||
> - !zone_reclaim(zone, gfp_mask, order))
> + if (zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, mark,
> + classzone_idx, alloc_flags))
> + goto try_this_zone;
> +
> + if (zone_reclaim_mode == 0)
> + goto this_zone_full;
> +
> + ret = zone_reclaim(zone, gfp_mask, order);
> + switch (ret) {
> + case ZONE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN:
> + /* did not scan */
> + goto try_next_zone;
> + case ZONE_RECLAIM_FULL:
> + /* scanned but unreclaimable */
> + goto this_zone_full;
> + default:
> + /* did we reclaim enough */
> + if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, mark,
> + classzone_idx, alloc_flags))
> goto this_zone_full;
> }
> }
>
> +try_this_zone:
> page = buffered_rmqueue(preferred_zone, zone, order,
> gfp_mask, migratetype);
> if (page)
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index d832ba8..7b8eb3f 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2465,16 +2465,16 @@ int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> */
> if (zone_pagecache_reclaimable(zone) <= zone->min_unmapped_pages &&
> zone_page_state(zone, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE) <= zone->min_slab_pages)
> - return 0;
> + return ZONE_RECLAIM_FULL;
>
> if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone))
> - return 0;
> + return ZONE_RECLAIM_FULL;
>
> /*
> * Do not scan if the allocation should not be delayed.
> */
> if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT) || (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC))
> - return 0;
> + return ZONE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN;
>
> /*
> * Only run zone reclaim on the local zone or on zones that do not
> @@ -2484,10 +2484,11 @@ int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> */
> node_id = zone_to_nid(zone);
> if (node_state(node_id, N_CPU) && node_id != numa_node_id())
> - return 0;
> + return ZONE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN;
>
> if (zone_test_and_set_flag(zone, ZONE_RECLAIM_LOCKED))
> - return 0;
> + return ZONE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN;
> +
> ret = __zone_reclaim(zone, gfp_mask, order);
> zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_RECLAIM_LOCKED);
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-11 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-11 10:47 [PATCH 0/3] Fix malloc() stall in zone_reclaim() and bring behaviour more in line with expectations V3 Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 10:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] Properly account for the number of page cache pages zone_reclaim() can reclaim Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 11:37 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-12 10:17 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-15 4:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-15 10:05 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 10:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] Do not unconditionally treat zones that fail zone_reclaim() as full Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 13:48 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2009-06-12 10:36 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-12 15:44 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-15 10:28 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-15 15:58 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-11 10:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] Count the number of times zone_reclaim() scans and fails Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 11:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-15 21:19 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-16 9:05 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 23:30 ` [PATCH 0/3] Fix malloc() stall in zone_reclaim() and bring behaviour more in line with expectations V3 Andrew Morton
2009-06-12 11:04 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-12 16:08 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-15 9:42 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-15 10:56 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-15 15:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-15 15:25 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-16 12:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-16 12:20 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-16 12:30 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-16 12:57 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-16 13:44 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-16 14:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-17 10:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-17 12:03 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-17 18:48 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.1.10.0906110948080.29827@gentwo.org \
--to=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox