From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail172.messagelabs.com (mail172.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.3]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6864C5F0019 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:45:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from makko.or.mcafeemobile.com by x35.xmailserver.org with [XMail 1.26 ESMTP Server] id for from ; Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:58:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 14:52:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Davide Libenzi Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/23] vfs: Teach epoll to use file_hotplug_lock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1243893048-17031-18-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Al Viro , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins , Tejun Heo , Alexey Dobriyan , Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Nick Piggin , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , "Eric W. Biederman" , "Eric W. Biederman" List-ID: On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Davide Libenzi writes: > > > On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > > >> From: Eric W. Biederman > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman > >> --- > >> fs/eventpoll.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > >> 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > This patchset gives me the willies for the amount of changes and possible > > impact on many subsystems. > > It both is and is not that bad. It is the cost of adding a lock. We both know that it is not only the cost of a lock, but also the sprinkling over a pretty vast amount of subsystems, of another layer of code. > I thought of doing something more uniform to user space. But I observed > that the existing epoll punts on the case of a file descriptor being closed > and locking to go from a file to the other epoll datastructures is pretty > horrid I said forget it and used the existing close behaviour. Well, you cannot rely on the caller to tidy up the epoll fd by issuing an epoll_ctl(DEL), so you do *need* to "punt" on close in order to not leave lingering crap around. You cannot even hold a reference of the file, since otherwise the epoll hooking will have to trigger not only at ->release() time, but at every close, where you'll have to figure out if this is the last real userspace reference or not. Plus all the issues related to holding permanent extra references to userspace files. And since a file can be added in many epoll devices, you need to unregister it from all of them (hence the other datastructures lookup). Better this, on the slow path, with locks acquired only in the epoll usage case, than some other thing and on the fast path, for every file. - Davide -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org