From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/12] hugetlb: add per node hstate attributes
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 15:10:15 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0910091507350.12760@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1255093027.14370.35.camel@useless.americas.hpqcorp.net>
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> > > +static void hugetlb_register_all_nodes(void)
> > > +{
> > > + int nid;
> > > +
> > > + for (nid = 0; nid < nr_node_ids; nid++) {
> > > + struct node *node = &node_devices[nid];
> > > + if (node->sysdev.id == nid)
> > > + hugetlb_register_node(node);
> > > + }
> >
> > This looks like another use of for_each_node_mask over N_HIGH_MEMORY. I
> > previously asked if the check for node->sysdev.id == nid is still
> > necessary at this point?
>
>
> Sorry. The check for sysdev.id == nid is there to ensure that this node
> sysdev has been registered when this function is called. nr_node_ids is
> the maximum node id seen so far, but we can't assume that all nodes
> 0..nr_node_ids are present/on-line.
>
> As for using for_each_node_mask: I think that would be OK. This code
> works because hugetlb_register_node() filters out nodes w/o memory; so
> only visiting nodes with memory should work as well. We can change this
> [for consistency] with an incremental patch, if you like.
>
> I'd hate to respin V11 for just this. But, if we have to for other
> reasons, I'll [try to remember to] do this.
>
I don't think it's necessary for a v11, I'd like to see this patchset
(perhaps minus patch 12/12 until we figure out whether it's actually
needed or not) added to -mm and then work on it there. This particular
case is only a small cleanup, but my curiosity really laid more in why
node->sysdev.id == nid was necessary instead of simply using
for_each_node_mask(nid, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]) since that should
certainly be a subset of for_each_online_node(nid).
Thanks for the clarification, we can do an incremental patch on -mm once
it's merged.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-09 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-08 16:24 [PATCH 0/12] hugetlb: V10 numa control of persistent huge pages alloc/free Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 16:25 ` [PATCH 1/12] nodemask: make NODEMASK_ALLOC more general Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 20:17 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-08 16:25 ` [PATCH 2/12] hugetlb: rework hstate_next_node_* functions Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 16:25 ` [PATCH 3/12] hugetlb: add nodemask arg to huge page alloc, free and surplus adjust fcns Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 20:32 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-08 16:25 ` [PATCH 4/12] hugetlb: factor init_nodemask_of_node Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 20:20 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-08 16:25 ` [PATCH 5/12] hugetlb: derive huge pages nodes allowed from task mempolicy Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 21:22 ` [patch] mm: add gfp flags for NODEMASK_ALLOC slab allocations David Rientjes
2009-10-09 1:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-08 16:25 ` [PATCH 6/12] hugetlb: add generic definition of NUMA_NO_NODE Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 20:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-08 20:26 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 21:44 ` [patch -mm] acpi: remove NID_INVAL David Rientjes
2009-10-28 14:53 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-29 18:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-08 16:25 ` [PATCH 7/12] hugetlb: add per node hstate attributes Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 20:42 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-09 12:57 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-09 22:10 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2009-10-09 13:49 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-09 22:18 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-12 15:41 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-13 2:09 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-08 16:25 ` [PATCH 8/12] hugetlb: update hugetlb documentation for NUMA controls Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 16:25 ` [PATCH 9/12] hugetlb: use only nodes with memory for huge pages Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 16:26 ` [PATCH 10/12] mm: clear node in N_HIGH_MEMORY and stop kswapd when all memory is offlined Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 20:19 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-08 16:26 ` [PATCH 11/12] hugetlb: handle memory hot-plug events Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-08 16:26 ` [PATCH 12/12] hugetlb: offload per node attribute registrations Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.1.00.0910091507350.12760@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox