From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7626B0055 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 16:26:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from zps37.corp.google.com (zps37.corp.google.com [172.25.146.37]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n98KQcEp022698 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 13:26:38 -0700 Received: from pxi36 (pxi36.prod.google.com [10.243.27.36]) by zps37.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n98KQQUN022297 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 13:26:35 -0700 Received: by pxi36 with SMTP id 36so5909964pxi.18 for ; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:26:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 13:26:34 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/12] hugetlb: add generic definition of NUMA_NO_NODE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20091008162454.23192.91832.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20091008162533.23192.71981.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Lee Schermerhorn , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , Randy Dunlap , Nishanth Aravamudan , Andi Kleen , Adam Litke , Andy Whitcroft , eric.whitney@hp.com List-ID: On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > Would it not be good to convert all the uses of -1 to NUMA_NO_NODE as > well? > An obvious conversion that could immediately be made would be of NID_INVAL in the acpi code. The x86 pci bus affinity handling also uses -1 to specify no node-specific affinity, so it sounds like a legitimate use case as well. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org