linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [patch 3/9] oom: change all_unreclaimable zone member to flags
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:23:17 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.0.9999.0709201320521.25753@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.0.9999.0709201319520.25753@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

Convert the int all_unreclaimable member of struct zone to
unsigned long flags.  This can now be used to specify several different
zone flags such as all_unreclaimable and reclaim_in_progress, which can
now be removed and converted to a per-zone flag.

Flags are set and cleared as follows:

	zone_set_flag(struct zone *zone, zone_flags_t flag)
	zone_clear_flag(struct zone *zone, zone_flags_t flag)

Defines the first zone flags, ZONE_ALL_UNRECLAIMABLE and
ZONE_RECLAIM_LOCKED, which have the same semantics as the old
zone->all_unreclaimable and zone->reclaim_in_progress, respectively.  Also
converts all current users that set or clear either flag to use the new
interface.

Helper functions are defined to test the flags:

	int zone_is_all_unreclaimable(const struct zone *zone)
	int zone_is_reclaim_locked(const struct zone *zone)

All flag operators are of the atomic variety because there are currently
readers that are implemented that do not take zone->lock.

Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
 include/linux/mmzone.h |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 mm/page_alloc.c        |    8 ++++----
 mm/vmscan.c            |   25 +++++++++++++------------
 mm/vmstat.c            |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -232,10 +232,7 @@ struct zone {
 	unsigned long		nr_scan_active;
 	unsigned long		nr_scan_inactive;
 	unsigned long		pages_scanned;	   /* since last reclaim */
-	int			all_unreclaimable; /* All pages pinned */
-
-	/* A count of how many reclaimers are scanning this zone */
-	atomic_t		reclaim_in_progress;
+	unsigned long		flags;		   /* zone flags, see below */
 
 	/* Zone statistics */
 	atomic_long_t		vm_stat[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS];
@@ -313,6 +310,29 @@ struct zone {
 	const char		*name;
 } ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
 
+typedef enum {
+	ZONE_ALL_UNRECLAIMABLE,		/* all pages pinned */
+	ZONE_RECLAIM_LOCKED,		/* prevents concurrent reclaim */
+} zone_flags_t;
+
+static inline void zone_set_flag(struct zone *zone, zone_flags_t flag)
+{
+	set_bit(flag, &zone->flags);
+}
+static inline void zone_clear_flag(struct zone *zone, zone_flags_t flag)
+{
+	clear_bit(flag, &zone->flags);
+}
+
+static inline int zone_is_all_unreclaimable(const struct zone *zone)
+{
+	return test_bit(ZONE_ALL_UNRECLAIMABLE, &zone->flags);
+}
+static inline int zone_is_reclaim_locked(const struct zone *zone)
+{
+	return test_bit(ZONE_RECLAIM_LOCKED, &zone->flags);
+}
+
 /*
  * The "priority" of VM scanning is how much of the queues we will scan in one
  * go. A value of 12 for DEF_PRIORITY implies that we will scan 1/4096th of the
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ static void free_pages_bulk(struct zone *zone, int count,
 					struct list_head *list, int order)
 {
 	spin_lock(&zone->lock);
-	zone->all_unreclaimable = 0;
+	zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_ALL_UNRECLAIMABLE);
 	zone->pages_scanned = 0;
 	while (count--) {
 		struct page *page;
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static void free_pages_bulk(struct zone *zone, int count,
 static void free_one_page(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int order)
 {
 	spin_lock(&zone->lock);
-	zone->all_unreclaimable = 0;
+	zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_ALL_UNRECLAIMABLE);
 	zone->pages_scanned = 0;
 	__free_one_page(page, zone, order);
 	spin_unlock(&zone->lock);
@@ -1617,7 +1617,7 @@ void show_free_areas(void)
 			K(zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE)),
 			K(zone->present_pages),
 			zone->pages_scanned,
-			(zone->all_unreclaimable ? "yes" : "no")
+			(zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone) ? "yes" : "no")
 			);
 		printk("lowmem_reserve[]:");
 		for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_ZONES; i++)
@@ -2978,7 +2978,7 @@ static void __meminit free_area_init_core(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
 		zone->nr_scan_active = 0;
 		zone->nr_scan_inactive = 0;
 		zap_zone_vm_stats(zone);
-		atomic_set(&zone->reclaim_in_progress, 0);
+		zone->flags = 0;
 		if (!size)
 			continue;
 
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1067,7 +1067,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone,
 	unsigned long nr_to_scan;
 	unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
 
-	atomic_inc(&zone->reclaim_in_progress);
+	zone_set_flag(zone, ZONE_RECLAIM_LOCKED);
 
 	/*
 	 * Add one to `nr_to_scan' just to make sure that the kernel will
@@ -1108,7 +1108,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone,
 
 	throttle_vm_writeout(sc->gfp_mask);
 
-	atomic_dec(&zone->reclaim_in_progress);
+	zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_RECLAIM_LOCKED);
 	return nr_reclaimed;
 }
 
@@ -1146,7 +1146,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_zones(int priority, struct zone **zones,
 
 		note_zone_scanning_priority(zone, priority);
 
-		if (zone->all_unreclaimable && priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
+		if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone) && priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
 			continue;	/* Let kswapd poll it */
 
 		sc->all_unreclaimable = 0;
@@ -1327,7 +1327,8 @@ loop_again:
 			if (!populated_zone(zone))
 				continue;
 
-			if (zone->all_unreclaimable && priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
+			if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone) &&
+			    priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
 				continue;
 
 			if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, zone->pages_high,
@@ -1362,7 +1363,8 @@ loop_again:
 			if (!populated_zone(zone))
 				continue;
 
-			if (zone->all_unreclaimable && priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
+			if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone) &&
+			    priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
 				continue;
 
 			if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, zone->pages_high,
@@ -1377,12 +1379,13 @@ loop_again:
 						lru_pages);
 			nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
 			total_scanned += sc.nr_scanned;
-			if (zone->all_unreclaimable)
+			if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone))
 				continue;
 			if (nr_slab == 0 && zone->pages_scanned >=
 				(zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE)
 				+ zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE)) * 6)
-					zone->all_unreclaimable = 1;
+					zone_set_flag(zone,
+						      ZONE_ALL_UNRECLAIMABLE);
 			/*
 			 * If we've done a decent amount of scanning and
 			 * the reclaim ratio is low, start doing writepage
@@ -1548,7 +1551,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_all_zones(unsigned long nr_pages, int prio,
 		if (!populated_zone(zone))
 			continue;
 
-		if (zone->all_unreclaimable && prio != DEF_PRIORITY)
+		if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone) && prio != DEF_PRIORITY)
 			continue;
 
 		/* For pass = 0 we don't shrink the active list */
@@ -1871,10 +1874,8 @@ int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
 	 * not have reclaimable pages and if we should not delay the allocation
 	 * then do not scan.
 	 */
-	if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT) ||
-		zone->all_unreclaimable ||
-		atomic_read(&zone->reclaim_in_progress) > 0 ||
-		(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC))
+	if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT) || zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone) ||
+		zone_is_reclaim_locked(zone) || (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC))
 			return 0;
 
 	/*
diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
--- a/mm/vmstat.c
+++ b/mm/vmstat.c
@@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ static int zoneinfo_show(struct seq_file *m, void *arg)
 			   "\n  all_unreclaimable: %u"
 			   "\n  prev_priority:     %i"
 			   "\n  start_pfn:         %lu",
-			   zone->all_unreclaimable,
+			   zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone),
 			   zone->prev_priority,
 			   zone->zone_start_pfn);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-20 20:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-20 20:23 [patch 0/9] oom killer serialization David Rientjes
2007-09-20 20:23 ` [patch 1/9] oom: move prototypes to appropriate header file David Rientjes
2007-09-20 20:23   ` [patch 2/9] oom: move constraints to enum David Rientjes
2007-09-20 20:23     ` David Rientjes [this message]
2007-09-20 20:23       ` [patch 4/9] oom: add per-zone locking David Rientjes
2007-09-20 20:23         ` [patch 5/9] oom: serialize out of memory calls David Rientjes
2007-09-20 20:23           ` [patch 6/9] oom: add oom_kill_asking_task sysctl David Rientjes
2007-09-20 20:23             ` [patch 7/9] oom: suppress extraneous stack and memory dump David Rientjes
2007-09-20 20:23               ` [patch 8/9] oom: compare cpuset mems_allowed instead of exclusive ancestors David Rientjes
2007-09-20 20:23                 ` [patch 9/9] oom: do not take callback_mutex David Rientjes
2007-09-20 22:04                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-20 22:01                 ` [patch 8/9] oom: compare cpuset mems_allowed instead of exclusive ancestors Christoph Lameter
2007-09-20 22:00               ` [patch 7/9] oom: suppress extraneous stack and memory dump Christoph Lameter
2007-09-20 22:03             ` [patch 6/9] oom: add oom_kill_asking_task sysctl Christoph Lameter
2007-09-20 22:07               ` David Rientjes
2007-09-20 22:09                 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-21  9:05             ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-20 21:59           ` [patch 5/9] oom: serialize out of memory calls Christoph Lameter
2007-09-21  9:01           ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-21 20:04             ` David Rientjes
2007-09-20 21:59         ` [patch 4/9] oom: add per-zone locking Christoph Lameter
2007-09-20 22:03           ` David Rientjes
2007-09-20 22:05             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-20 22:12               ` David Rientjes
2007-09-20 22:26                 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-20 22:48                   ` David Rientjes
2007-09-21  8:59                     ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-20 21:56       ` [patch 3/9] oom: change all_unreclaimable zone member to flags Christoph Lameter
2007-09-20 21:58         ` David Rientjes
2007-09-21  8:55       ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-21  9:12 ` [patch 0/9] oom killer serialization Andrew Morton
2007-09-21  9:21   ` David Rientjes
2007-09-21 19:13     ` David Rientjes
2007-09-21 19:15   ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.0.9999.0709201320521.25753@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox