linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [patch 8/8] oom: do not check cpuset in badness scoring
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:24:39 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.0.9999.0709190352030.23538@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.0.9999.0709190351460.23538@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

It is no longer necessary to check whether a task's cpuset nodes overlap
with current because the tasklist has already been filtered with respect
to zones shared in the zonelist.

This leads to a nice optimization since callback_mutex is no longer
required; we can now have parallel OOM killings happening in separate
cpusets if their memory is mutually exclusive.

Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
 include/linux/cpuset.h |    6 ------
 kernel/cpuset.c        |   27 ---------------------------
 mm/oom_kill.c          |   11 -----------
 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
--- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
@@ -58,9 +58,6 @@ extern void __cpuset_memory_pressure_bump(void);
 extern const struct file_operations proc_cpuset_operations;
 extern char *cpuset_task_status_allowed(struct task_struct *task, char *buffer);
 
-extern void cpuset_lock(void);
-extern void cpuset_unlock(void);
-
 extern int cpuset_mem_spread_node(void);
 
 static inline int cpuset_do_page_mem_spread(void)
@@ -128,9 +125,6 @@ static inline char *cpuset_task_status_allowed(struct task_struct *task,
 	return buffer;
 }
 
-static inline void cpuset_lock(void) {}
-static inline void cpuset_unlock(void) {}
-
 static inline int cpuset_mem_spread_node(void)
 {
 	return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -2524,33 +2524,6 @@ int __cpuset_zone_allowed_hardwall(struct zone *z, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 }
 
 /**
- * cpuset_lock - lock out any changes to cpuset structures
- *
- * The out of memory (oom) code needs to mutex_lock cpusets
- * from being changed while it scans the tasklist looking for a
- * task in an overlapping cpuset.  Expose callback_mutex via this
- * cpuset_lock() routine, so the oom code can lock it, before
- * locking the task list.  The tasklist_lock is a spinlock, so
- * must be taken inside callback_mutex.
- */
-
-void cpuset_lock(void)
-{
-	mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
-}
-
-/**
- * cpuset_unlock - release lock on cpuset changes
- *
- * Undo the lock taken in a previous cpuset_lock() call.
- */
-
-void cpuset_unlock(void)
-{
-	mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
-}
-
-/**
  * cpuset_mem_spread_node() - On which node to begin search for a page
  *
  * If a task is marked PF_SPREAD_PAGE or PF_SPREAD_SLAB (as for
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -145,14 +145,6 @@ unsigned long badness(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long uptime)
 		points /= 4;
 
 	/*
-	 * If p's nodes don't overlap ours, it may still help to kill p
-	 * because p may have allocated or otherwise mapped memory on
-	 * this node before. However it will be less likely.
-	 */
-	if (!cpuset_excl_nodes_overlap(p))
-		points /= 8;
-
-	/*
 	 * Adjust the score by oomkilladj.
 	 */
 	if (p->oomkilladj) {
@@ -532,7 +524,6 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order)
 	 * NUMA) that may require different handling.
 	 */
 	constraint = constrained_alloc(zonelist, gfp_mask);
-	cpuset_lock();
 	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
 
 	switch (constraint) {
@@ -575,7 +566,6 @@ retry:
 		/* Found nothing?!?! Either we hang forever, or we panic. */
 		if (!p) {
 			read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
-			cpuset_unlock();
 			panic("Out of memory and no killable processes...\n");
 		}
 
@@ -587,7 +577,6 @@ retry:
 
 out:
 	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
-	cpuset_unlock();
 
 	/*
 	 * Give "p" a good chance of killing itself before we

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-19 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-19 18:24 [patch 0/8] oom killer updates David Rientjes
2007-09-19 18:24 ` [patch 1/8] oom: move prototypes to appropriate header file David Rientjes
2007-09-19 18:24   ` [patch 2/8] oom: move constraints to enum David Rientjes
2007-09-19 18:24     ` [patch 3/8] oom: save zonelist pointer for oom killer calls David Rientjes
2007-09-19 18:24       ` [patch 4/8] oom: serialize out of memory calls David Rientjes
2007-09-19 18:24         ` [patch 5/8] oom: add per-cpuset file oom_kill_asking_task David Rientjes
2007-09-19 18:24           ` [patch 6/8] oom: suppress extraneous stack and memory dump David Rientjes
2007-09-19 18:24             ` [patch 7/8] oom: only kill tasks that share zones with zonelist David Rientjes
2007-09-19 18:24               ` David Rientjes [this message]
2007-09-19 19:06                 ` [patch 8/8] oom: do not check cpuset in badness scoring Christoph Lameter
2007-09-19 18:57               ` [patch 7/8] oom: only kill tasks that share zones with zonelist Christoph Lameter
2007-09-20  5:50                 ` David Rientjes
2007-09-20 17:58                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-20 18:37                     ` David Rientjes
2007-09-20 18:44                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-19 19:00         ` [patch 4/8] oom: serialize out of memory calls Christoph Lameter
2007-09-19 20:30           ` David Rientjes
2007-09-19 19:05       ` [patch 3/8] oom: save zonelist pointer for oom killer calls Christoph Lameter
2007-09-19 20:37         ` David Rientjes
2007-09-19 20:54           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-19 21:20             ` David Rientjes
2007-09-19 23:51               ` Tim Pepper
2007-09-20  5:43                 ` David Rientjes
2007-09-20 17:56                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-19 19:01   ` [patch 1/8] oom: move prototypes to appropriate header file Christoph Lameter
2007-09-19 19:49 ` [patch 0/8] oom killer updates Paul Jackson
2007-09-19 20:24   ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.0.9999.0709190352030.23538@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox