From: "Harry Yoo (Oracle)" <harry@kernel.org>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.se>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: fix data loss and overflow in krealloc()
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 13:42:44 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeG6RG41sgZuerYa@hyeyoo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260416132837.3787694-1-elver@google.com>
[+Cc relevant folks]
On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 03:25:07PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> Commit 2cd8231796b5 ("mm/slub: allow to set node and align in
> k[v]realloc") introduced the ability to force a reallocation if the
> original object does not satisfy new alignment or NUMA node, even when
> the object is being shrunk.
>
> This introduced two bugs in the reallocation fallback path:
>
> 1. Data loss during NUMA migration: The jump to 'alloc_new' happens
> before 'ks' and 'orig_size' are initialized. As a result, the
> memcpy() in the 'alloc_new' block would copy 0 bytes into the new
> allocation.
Ouch.
> 2. Buffer overflow during shrinking: When shrinking an object while
> forcing a new alignment, 'new_size' is smaller than the old size.
> However, the memcpy() used the old size ('orig_size ?: ks'), leading
> to an out-of-bounds write.
Right. before the commit we didn't reallocate when the size is smaller.
> The same overflow bug exists in the kvrealloc() fallback path, where the
> old bucket size ksize(p) is copied into the new buffer without being
> bounded by the new size.
>
> A simple reproducer:
>
> // e.g. add to lkdtm as KREALLOC_SHRINK_OVERFLOW
> while (1) {
> void *p = kmalloc(128, GFP_KERNEL);
> p = krealloc_node_align(p, 64, 256, GFP_KERNEL, NUMA_NO_NODE);
> kfree(p);
> }
>
> demonstrates the issue:
>
> ==================================================================
> BUG: KFENCE: out-of-bounds write in memcpy_orig+0x68/0x130
>
> Out-of-bounds write at 0xffff8883ad757038 (120B right of kfence-#47):
> memcpy_orig+0x68/0x130
> krealloc_node_align_noprof+0x1c8/0x340
> lkdtm_KREALLOC_SHRINK_OVERFLOW+0x8c/0xc0 [lkdtm]
> lkdtm_do_action+0x3a/0x60 [lkdtm]
> ...
>
> kfence-#47: 0xffff8883ad756fc0-0xffff8883ad756fff, size=64, cache=kmalloc-64
>
> allocated by task 316 on cpu 7 at 97.680481s (0.021813s ago):
> krealloc_node_align_noprof+0x19c/0x340
> lkdtm_KREALLOC_SHRINK_OVERFLOW+0x8c/0xc0 [lkdtm]
> lkdtm_do_action+0x3a/0x60 [lkdtm]
> ...
> ==================================================================
>
> Fix it by moving the old size calculation to the top of __do_krealloc()
> and bounding all copy lengths by the new allocation size.
>
> Fixes: 2cd8231796b5 ("mm/slub: allow to set node and align in k[v]realloc")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Reported-by: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260415143735.2974230-1-elver%40google.com
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> ---
Looks good to me, but I think we still have a similar issue in
vrealloc_node_align_noprof()? (goto need_realloc; due to NUMA mismatch
but the new size is smaller)
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-17 4:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-16 13:25 Marco Elver
2026-04-17 4:42 ` Harry Yoo (Oracle) [this message]
2026-04-17 9:05 ` Marco Elver
2026-04-17 9:21 ` Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-04-17 9:11 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aeG6RG41sgZuerYa@hyeyoo \
--to=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=vitaly.wool@konsulko.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox