From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io>, kernel-team@fb.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, riel@surriel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mm/ksm: add "smart" page scanning mode
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 09:41:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae2be79c-a030-a4d2-0d89-15efa17fe77c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230926040939.516161-2-shr@devkernel.io>
On 26.09.23 06:09, Stefan Roesch wrote:
> This change adds a "smart" page scanning mode for KSM. So far all the
> candidate pages are continuously scanned to find candidates for
> de-duplication. There are a considerably number of pages that cannot be
> de-duplicated. This is costly in terms of CPU. By using smart scanning
> considerable CPU savings can be achieved.
>
> This change takes the history of scanning pages into account and skips
> the page scanning of certain pages for a while if de-deduplication for
> this page has not been successful in the past.
>
> To do this it introduces two new fields in the ksm_rmap_item structure:
> age and remaining_skips. age, is the KSM age and remaining_skips
> determines how often scanning of this page is skipped. The age field is
> incremented each time the page is scanned and the page cannot be de-
> duplicated. age updated is capped at U8_MAX.
>
> How often a page is skipped is dependent how often de-duplication has
> been tried so far and the number of skips is currently limited to 8.
> This value has shown to be effective with different workloads.
>
> The feature is currently disable by default and can be enabled with the
> new smart_scan knob.
>
> The feature has shown to be very effective: upt to 25% of the page scans
> can be eliminated; the pages_to_scan rate can be reduced by 40 - 50% and
> a similar de-duplication rate can be maintained.
Thinking about it, what are the cons of just enabling this always and
not exposing new toggles? Alternatively, we could make this a
compile-time option.
In general, LGTM, just curious if we really have to make this configurable.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-26 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-26 4:09 [PATCH v3 0/4] Smart scanning mode for KSM Stefan Roesch
2023-09-26 4:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mm/ksm: add "smart" page scanning mode Stefan Roesch
2023-09-26 7:41 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2023-09-26 16:13 ` Stefan Roesch
2023-09-26 21:09 ` Andrew Morton
2023-09-27 0:39 ` Stefan Roesch
2023-09-27 9:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-09-26 4:09 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mm/ksm: add pages_skipped metric Stefan Roesch
2023-09-26 4:09 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm/ksm: document smart scan mode Stefan Roesch
2023-09-26 4:09 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] mm/ksm: document pages_skipped sysfs knob Stefan Roesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae2be79c-a030-a4d2-0d89-15efa17fe77c@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=shr@devkernel.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox