linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@suse.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	marcelo.cerri@canonical.com, tim.gardner@canonical.com,
	khalid.elmously@canonical.com, philip.cox@canonical.com,
	aarcange@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv11 4/9] x86/boot/compressed: Handle unaccepted memory
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 10:52:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae0bee7f-0fa1-caec-a4c9-10170b1b38af@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230513220418.19357-5-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

On 5/13/23 17:04, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> The firmware will pre-accept the memory used to run the stub. But, the
> stub is responsible for accepting the memory into which it decompresses
> the main kernel. Accept memory just before decompression starts.
> 
> The stub is also responsible for choosing a physical address in which to
> place the decompressed kernel image. The KASLR mechanism will randomize
> this physical address. Since the unaccepted memory region is relatively
> small, KASLR would be quite ineffective if it only used the pre-accepted
> area (EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY). Ensure that KASLR randomizes among the
> entire physical address space by also including EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>

> ---
>   arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h   |  1 +
>   arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>   arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c  |  6 ++++++
>   arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h  |  6 ++++++
>   4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h
> index 7db2f41b54cd..cf475243b6d5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ typedef	struct {
>   } efi_table_hdr_t;
>   
>   #define EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY		 7
> +#define EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY		15
>   
>   #define EFI_MEMORY_MORE_RELIABLE \
>   				((u64)0x0000000000010000ULL)	/* higher reliability */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> index 454757fbdfe5..749f0fe7e446 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> @@ -672,6 +672,28 @@ static bool process_mem_region(struct mem_vector *region,
>   }
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_EFI
> +
> +/*
> + * Only EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY and EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY (if supported) are
> + * guaranteed to be free.
> + *
> + * It is more conservative in picking free memory than the EFI spec allows:
> + *
> + * According to the spec, EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_{CODE|DATA} are also free memory
> + * and thus available to place the kernel image into, but in practice there's
> + * firmware where using that memory leads to crashes.
> + */
> +static inline bool memory_type_is_free(efi_memory_desc_t *md)
> +{
> +	if (md->type == EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	if (md->type == EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY)
> +		return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY);
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * Returns true if we processed the EFI memmap, which we prefer over the E820
>    * table if it is available.
> @@ -716,18 +738,7 @@ process_efi_entries(unsigned long minimum, unsigned long image_size)
>   	for (i = 0; i < nr_desc; i++) {
>   		md = efi_early_memdesc_ptr(pmap, e->efi_memdesc_size, i);
>   
> -		/*
> -		 * Here we are more conservative in picking free memory than
> -		 * the EFI spec allows:
> -		 *
> -		 * According to the spec, EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_{CODE|DATA} are also
> -		 * free memory and thus available to place the kernel image into,
> -		 * but in practice there's firmware where using that memory leads
> -		 * to crashes.
> -		 *
> -		 * Only EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY is guaranteed to be free.
> -		 */
> -		if (md->type != EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY)
> +		if (!memory_type_is_free(md))
>   			continue;
>   
>   		if (efi_soft_reserve_enabled() &&
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c
> index 014ff222bf4b..eb8df0d4ad51 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c
> @@ -455,6 +455,12 @@ asmlinkage __visible void *extract_kernel(void *rmode, memptr heap,
>   #endif
>   
>   	debug_putstr("\nDecompressing Linux... ");
> +
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY)) {
> +		debug_putstr("Accepting memory... ");
> +		accept_memory(__pa(output), __pa(output) + needed_size);
> +	}
> +
>   	__decompress(input_data, input_len, NULL, NULL, output, output_len,
>   			NULL, error);
>   	entry_offset = parse_elf(output);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
> index 2f155a0e3041..9663d1839f54 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
> @@ -247,4 +247,10 @@ static inline unsigned long efi_find_vendor_table(struct boot_params *bp,
>   }
>   #endif /* CONFIG_EFI */
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY
> +void accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end);
> +#else
> +static inline void accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end) {}
> +#endif
> +
>   #endif /* BOOT_COMPRESSED_MISC_H */


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-17 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-13 22:04 [PATCHv11 0/9] mm, x86/cc, efi: Implement support for " Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-13 22:04 ` [PATCHv11 1/9] mm: Add " Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 19:44   ` Tom Lendacky
2023-05-16 21:32     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-13 22:04 ` [PATCHv11 2/9] efi/x86: Get full memory map in allocate_e820() Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 19:52   ` Tom Lendacky
2023-05-13 22:04 ` [PATCHv11 3/9] efi/libstub: Implement support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-14  5:08   ` Mika Penttilä
2023-05-14 21:13     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 18:01       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-16 18:06   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-13 22:04 ` [PATCHv11 4/9] x86/boot/compressed: Handle " Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 17:09   ` Liam Merwick
2023-05-17 15:52   ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2023-05-13 22:04 ` [PATCHv11 5/9] efi: Provide helpers for " Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 12:06   ` [PATCHv11.1 5/9] efi: Add unaccepted memory support Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 17:25     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-17 15:58     ` Tom Lendacky
2023-05-13 22:04 ` [PATCHv11 6/9] efi/unaccepted: Avoid load_unaligned_zeropad() stepping into unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 18:08   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-16 18:27     ` Dave Hansen
2023-05-16 18:35       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-16 19:15         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 20:03         ` Dave Hansen
2023-05-16 21:52           ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 21:59             ` Dave Hansen
2023-05-16 22:15               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-16 18:33     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 23:04       ` Dave Hansen
2023-05-17 16:07   ` Tom Lendacky
2023-05-13 22:04 ` [PATCHv11 7/9] x86/tdx: Make _tdx_hypercall() and __tdx_module_call() available in boot stub Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-13 22:04 ` [PATCHv11 8/9] x86/tdx: Refactor try_accept_one() Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-13 22:04 ` [PATCHv11 9/9] x86/tdx: Add unaccepted memory support Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 22:41 ` [PATCHv11 0/9] mm, x86/cc, efi: Implement support for unaccepted memory Tom Lendacky
2023-05-16 23:22   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-17 14:32     ` Tom Lendacky
2023-05-17 18:36       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-17 18:50         ` Tom Lendacky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ae0bee7f-0fa1-caec-a4c9-10170b1b38af@amd.com \
    --to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dfaggioli@suse.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=khalid.elmously@canonical.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo.cerri@canonical.com \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=philip.cox@canonical.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox