From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@suse.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
marcelo.cerri@canonical.com, tim.gardner@canonical.com,
khalid.elmously@canonical.com, philip.cox@canonical.com,
aarcange@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv11 4/9] x86/boot/compressed: Handle unaccepted memory
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 10:52:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae0bee7f-0fa1-caec-a4c9-10170b1b38af@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230513220418.19357-5-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
On 5/13/23 17:04, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> The firmware will pre-accept the memory used to run the stub. But, the
> stub is responsible for accepting the memory into which it decompresses
> the main kernel. Accept memory just before decompression starts.
>
> The stub is also responsible for choosing a physical address in which to
> place the decompressed kernel image. The KASLR mechanism will randomize
> this physical address. Since the unaccepted memory region is relatively
> small, KASLR would be quite ineffective if it only used the pre-accepted
> area (EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY). Ensure that KASLR randomizes among the
> entire physical address space by also including EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c | 6 ++++++
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h | 6 ++++++
> 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h
> index 7db2f41b54cd..cf475243b6d5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ typedef struct {
> } efi_table_hdr_t;
>
> #define EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY 7
> +#define EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY 15
>
> #define EFI_MEMORY_MORE_RELIABLE \
> ((u64)0x0000000000010000ULL) /* higher reliability */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> index 454757fbdfe5..749f0fe7e446 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> @@ -672,6 +672,28 @@ static bool process_mem_region(struct mem_vector *region,
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_EFI
> +
> +/*
> + * Only EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY and EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY (if supported) are
> + * guaranteed to be free.
> + *
> + * It is more conservative in picking free memory than the EFI spec allows:
> + *
> + * According to the spec, EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_{CODE|DATA} are also free memory
> + * and thus available to place the kernel image into, but in practice there's
> + * firmware where using that memory leads to crashes.
> + */
> +static inline bool memory_type_is_free(efi_memory_desc_t *md)
> +{
> + if (md->type == EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY)
> + return true;
> +
> + if (md->type == EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY)
> + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY);
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Returns true if we processed the EFI memmap, which we prefer over the E820
> * table if it is available.
> @@ -716,18 +738,7 @@ process_efi_entries(unsigned long minimum, unsigned long image_size)
> for (i = 0; i < nr_desc; i++) {
> md = efi_early_memdesc_ptr(pmap, e->efi_memdesc_size, i);
>
> - /*
> - * Here we are more conservative in picking free memory than
> - * the EFI spec allows:
> - *
> - * According to the spec, EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_{CODE|DATA} are also
> - * free memory and thus available to place the kernel image into,
> - * but in practice there's firmware where using that memory leads
> - * to crashes.
> - *
> - * Only EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY is guaranteed to be free.
> - */
> - if (md->type != EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY)
> + if (!memory_type_is_free(md))
> continue;
>
> if (efi_soft_reserve_enabled() &&
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c
> index 014ff222bf4b..eb8df0d4ad51 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c
> @@ -455,6 +455,12 @@ asmlinkage __visible void *extract_kernel(void *rmode, memptr heap,
> #endif
>
> debug_putstr("\nDecompressing Linux... ");
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY)) {
> + debug_putstr("Accepting memory... ");
> + accept_memory(__pa(output), __pa(output) + needed_size);
> + }
> +
> __decompress(input_data, input_len, NULL, NULL, output, output_len,
> NULL, error);
> entry_offset = parse_elf(output);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
> index 2f155a0e3041..9663d1839f54 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
> @@ -247,4 +247,10 @@ static inline unsigned long efi_find_vendor_table(struct boot_params *bp,
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_EFI */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY
> +void accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end);
> +#else
> +static inline void accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end) {}
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* BOOT_COMPRESSED_MISC_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-17 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-13 22:04 [PATCHv11 0/9] mm, x86/cc, efi: Implement support for " Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-13 22:04 ` [PATCHv11 1/9] mm: Add " Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 19:44 ` Tom Lendacky
2023-05-16 21:32 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-13 22:04 ` [PATCHv11 2/9] efi/x86: Get full memory map in allocate_e820() Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 19:52 ` Tom Lendacky
2023-05-13 22:04 ` [PATCHv11 3/9] efi/libstub: Implement support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-14 5:08 ` Mika Penttilä
2023-05-14 21:13 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 18:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-16 18:06 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-13 22:04 ` [PATCHv11 4/9] x86/boot/compressed: Handle " Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 17:09 ` Liam Merwick
2023-05-17 15:52 ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2023-05-13 22:04 ` [PATCHv11 5/9] efi: Provide helpers for " Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 12:06 ` [PATCHv11.1 5/9] efi: Add unaccepted memory support Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 17:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-17 15:58 ` Tom Lendacky
2023-05-13 22:04 ` [PATCHv11 6/9] efi/unaccepted: Avoid load_unaligned_zeropad() stepping into unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 18:08 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-16 18:27 ` Dave Hansen
2023-05-16 18:35 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-16 19:15 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 20:03 ` Dave Hansen
2023-05-16 21:52 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 21:59 ` Dave Hansen
2023-05-16 22:15 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-16 18:33 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 23:04 ` Dave Hansen
2023-05-17 16:07 ` Tom Lendacky
2023-05-13 22:04 ` [PATCHv11 7/9] x86/tdx: Make _tdx_hypercall() and __tdx_module_call() available in boot stub Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-13 22:04 ` [PATCHv11 8/9] x86/tdx: Refactor try_accept_one() Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-13 22:04 ` [PATCHv11 9/9] x86/tdx: Add unaccepted memory support Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-16 22:41 ` [PATCHv11 0/9] mm, x86/cc, efi: Implement support for unaccepted memory Tom Lendacky
2023-05-16 23:22 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-17 14:32 ` Tom Lendacky
2023-05-17 18:36 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-05-17 18:50 ` Tom Lendacky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae0bee7f-0fa1-caec-a4c9-10170b1b38af@amd.com \
--to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dfaggioli@suse.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=khalid.elmously@canonical.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.cerri@canonical.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=philip.cox@canonical.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox