From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>,
Tangquan Zheng <zhengtangquan@oppo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm: use per_vma lock for MADV_DONTNEED
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:21:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ade4bd69-7f76-4e3a-b81d-ebb7c9653e4a@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250607220150.2980-1-21cnbao@gmail.com>
On 6/8/25 6:01 AM, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
>
> Certain madvise operations, especially MADV_DONTNEED, occur far more
> frequently than other madvise options, particularly in native and Java
> heaps for dynamic memory management.
>
> Currently, the mmap_lock is always held during these operations, even when
> unnecessary. This causes lock contention and can lead to severe priority
> inversion, where low-priority threads—such as Android's HeapTaskDaemon—
> hold the lock and block higher-priority threads.
>
> This patch enables the use of per-VMA locks when the advised range lies
> entirely within a single VMA, avoiding the need for full VMA traversal. In
> practice, userspace heaps rarely issue MADV_DONTNEED across multiple VMAs.
>
> Tangquan’s testing shows that over 99.5% of memory reclaimed by Android
> benefits from this per-VMA lock optimization. After extended runtime,
> 217,735 madvise calls from HeapTaskDaemon used the per-VMA path, while
> only 1,231 fell back to mmap_lock.
>
> To simplify handling, the implementation falls back to the standard
> mmap_lock if userfaultfd is enabled on the VMA, avoiding the complexity of
> userfaultfd_remove().
>
> Many thanks to Lorenzo's work[1] on:
> "Refactor the madvise() code to retain state about the locking mode
> utilised for traversing VMAs.
>
> Then use this mechanism to permit VMA locking to be done later in the
> madvise() logic and also to allow altering of the locking mode to permit
> falling back to an mmap read lock if required."
>
> One important point, as pointed out by Jann[2], is that
> untagged_addr_remote() requires holding mmap_lock. This is because
> address tagging on x86 and RISC-V is quite complex.
>
> Until untagged_addr_remote() becomes atomic—which seems unlikely in
> the near future—we cannot support per-VMA locks for remote processes.
> So for now, only local processes are supported.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0b96ce61-a52c-4036-b5b6-5c50783db51f@lucifer.local/ [1]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAG48ez11zi-1jicHUZtLhyoNPGGVB+ROeAJCUw48bsjk4bbEkA@mail.gmail.com/ [2]
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> Cc: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
> Cc: Tangquan Zheng <zhengtangquan@oppo.com>
> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
> ---
> -v4:
> * collect Lorenzo's RB;
> * use visit() for per-vma path
>
> mm/madvise.c | 195 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 147 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
Acked-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-09 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-07 22:01 Barry Song
2025-06-09 7:21 ` Qi Zheng [this message]
2025-06-17 13:38 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-18 2:25 ` Lance Yang
2025-06-18 9:52 ` Barry Song
2025-06-18 10:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-18 10:30 ` Barry Song
2025-06-18 10:32 ` Barry Song
2025-06-18 13:05 ` Lance Yang
2025-06-18 13:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-18 10:11 ` Barry Song
2025-06-18 10:33 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-18 10:36 ` Barry Song
2025-08-04 0:58 ` Lai, Yi
2025-08-04 7:19 ` Barry Song
2025-08-04 7:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-04 8:26 ` Qi Zheng
2025-08-04 8:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-04 8:49 ` Lai, Yi
2025-08-04 9:15 ` Barry Song
2025-08-04 9:35 ` Qi Zheng
2025-08-04 9:52 ` Qi Zheng
2025-08-04 10:04 ` Barry Song
2025-08-04 21:48 ` Barry Song
2025-08-05 2:52 ` Lai, Yi
2025-08-04 8:19 ` Barry Song
2025-11-04 8:34 ` Kefeng Wang
2025-11-04 9:01 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-04 12:09 ` Kefeng Wang
2025-11-04 15:21 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-05 1:04 ` Kefeng Wang
2025-11-17 23:35 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ade4bd69-7f76-4e3a-b81d-ebb7c9653e4a@bytedance.com \
--to=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lokeshgidra@google.com \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=zhengtangquan@oppo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox