From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: dio_get_page() lockdep complaints References: <20070419073828.GB20928@kernel.dk> <20070419012540.bed394e2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070419083407.GD20928@kernel.dk> <200704191643.38367.vs@namesys.com> <20070419124933.GE11780@kernel.dk> <20070419125236.GF11780@kernel.dk> From: Roland Dreier Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:53:55 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20070419125236.GF11780@kernel.dk> (Jens Axboe's message of "Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:52:36 +0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Jens Axboe Cc: "Vladimir V. Saveliev" , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, reiserfs-dev@namesys.com, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Maybe you could add some hack really early on (say at the beginning of the reiserfs mount code) that took instances of the locks in the correct order, so you would get a lockdep trace of where the ordering is violated when it first happens? - R. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org