From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: willy@infradead.org, ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com,
namhyung@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 PATCH 4/5] mm: mmap: zap pages with read mmap_sem for large mapping
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 10:07:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad7e1251-58f7-0903-18d0-646744c0665a@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180702135311.GY19043@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 7/2/18 6:53 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sat 30-06-18 06:39:44, Yang Shi wrote:
>> When running some mmap/munmap scalability tests with large memory (i.e.
>>> 300GB), the below hung task issue may happen occasionally.
>> INFO: task ps:14018 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>> Tainted: G E 4.9.79-009.ali3000.alios7.x86_64 #1
>> "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this
>> message.
>> ps D 0 14018 1 0x00000004
>> ffff885582f84000 ffff885e8682f000 ffff880972943000 ffff885ebf499bc0
>> ffff8828ee120000 ffffc900349bfca8 ffffffff817154d0 0000000000000040
>> 00ffffff812f872a ffff885ebf499bc0 024000d000948300 ffff880972943000
>> Call Trace:
>> [<ffffffff817154d0>] ? __schedule+0x250/0x730
>> [<ffffffff817159e6>] schedule+0x36/0x80
>> [<ffffffff81718560>] rwsem_down_read_failed+0xf0/0x150
>> [<ffffffff81390a28>] call_rwsem_down_read_failed+0x18/0x30
>> [<ffffffff81717db0>] down_read+0x20/0x40
>> [<ffffffff812b9439>] proc_pid_cmdline_read+0xd9/0x4e0
>> [<ffffffff81253c95>] ? do_filp_open+0xa5/0x100
>> [<ffffffff81241d87>] __vfs_read+0x37/0x150
>> [<ffffffff812f824b>] ? security_file_permission+0x9b/0xc0
>> [<ffffffff81242266>] vfs_read+0x96/0x130
>> [<ffffffff812437b5>] SyS_read+0x55/0xc0
>> [<ffffffff8171a6da>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1a/0xc5
>>
>> It is because munmap holds mmap_sem from very beginning to all the way
>> down to the end, and doesn't release it in the middle. When unmapping
>> large mapping, it may take long time (take ~18 seconds to unmap 320GB
>> mapping with every single page mapped on an idle machine).
>>
>> It is because munmap holds mmap_sem from very beginning to all the way
>> down to the end, and doesn't release it in the middle. When unmapping
>> large mapping, it may take long time (take ~18 seconds to unmap 320GB
>> mapping with every single page mapped on an idle machine).
>>
>> Zapping pages is the most time consuming part, according to the
>> suggestion from Michal Hock [1], zapping pages can be done with holding
> s@Hock@Hocko@
Sorry for the wrong spelling.
>
>> read mmap_sem, like what MADV_DONTNEED does. Then re-acquire write
>> mmap_sem to cleanup vmas. All zapped vmas will have VM_DEAD flag set,
>> the page fault to VM_DEAD vma will trigger SIGSEGV.
> This really deserves an explanation why the all dance is really needed.
>
> It would be also good to mention how do you achieve the overal
> consistency. E.g. you are dropping mmap_sem and then re-taking it for
> write. What if any pending write lock succeeds and modify the address
> space? Does it matter, why if not?
Sure.
>
>> Define large mapping size thresh as PUD size or 1GB, just zap pages with
>> read mmap_sem for mappings which are >= thresh value.
>>
>> If the vma has VM_LOCKED | VM_HUGETLB | VM_PFNMAP or uprobe, then just
>> fallback to regular path since unmapping those mappings need acquire
>> write mmap_sem.
>>
>> For the time being, just do this in munmap syscall path. Other
>> vm_munmap() or do_munmap() call sites remain intact for stability
>> reason.
> What are those stability reasons?
mmap() and mremap() may call do_munmap() as well, so it may introduce
more race condition if they use the zap early version of do_munmap too.
They would have much more chances to take mmap_sem to change address
space and cause conflict.
And, it looks they are not the vital source of long period of write
mmap_sem hold. So, it sounds not worth making things more complicated
for the time being.
>
>> The below is some regression and performance data collected on a machine
>> with 32 cores of E5-2680 @ 2.70GHz and 384GB memory.
>>
>> With the patched kernel, write mmap_sem hold time is dropped to us level
>> from second.
> I haven't read through the implemenation carefuly TBH but the changelog
> needs quite some work to explain the solution and resulting semantic of
> munmap after the change.
Thanks for the suggestion. Will polish the changelog.
Yang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-02 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-29 22:39 [RFC v3 PATCH 0/5] mm: zap pages with read mmap_sem in munmap " Yang Shi
2018-06-29 22:39 ` [RFC v3 PATCH 1/5] uprobes: make vma_has_uprobes non-static Yang Shi
2018-06-29 22:39 ` [RFC v3 PATCH 2/5] mm: introduce VM_DEAD flag Yang Shi
2018-07-02 13:40 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-29 22:39 ` [RFC v3 PATCH 3/5] mm: refactor do_munmap() to extract the common part Yang Shi
2018-07-02 13:42 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-02 16:59 ` Yang Shi
2018-07-02 17:58 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-02 18:02 ` Yang Shi
2018-06-29 22:39 ` [RFC v3 PATCH 4/5] mm: mmap: zap pages with read mmap_sem for large mapping Yang Shi
2018-06-30 1:28 ` Andrew Morton
2018-06-30 2:10 ` Yang Shi
2018-06-30 1:35 ` Andrew Morton
2018-06-30 2:28 ` Yang Shi
2018-06-30 3:15 ` Andrew Morton
2018-06-30 4:26 ` Yang Shi
2018-07-03 0:01 ` Yang Shi
2018-07-02 14:05 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-02 20:48 ` Andrew Morton
2018-07-03 6:09 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-03 16:53 ` Yang Shi
2018-07-03 18:22 ` Yang Shi
2018-07-04 8:13 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-02 12:33 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-07-02 12:49 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-03 8:12 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-07-03 8:27 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-03 9:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-07-03 11:34 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-03 12:14 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-07-03 17:00 ` Yang Shi
2018-07-02 17:19 ` Yang Shi
2018-07-03 8:07 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-07-02 13:53 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-02 17:07 ` Yang Shi [this message]
2018-06-29 22:39 ` [RFC v3 PATCH 5/5] x86: check VM_DEAD flag in page fault Yang Shi
2018-07-02 8:45 ` Laurent Dufour
2018-07-02 12:15 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-02 12:26 ` Laurent Dufour
2018-07-02 12:45 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-02 13:33 ` Laurent Dufour
2018-07-02 13:37 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-02 17:24 ` Yang Shi
2018-07-02 17:57 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-02 18:10 ` Yang Shi
2018-07-03 6:17 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-03 16:50 ` Yang Shi
2018-07-02 13:39 ` [RFC v3 PATCH 0/5] mm: zap pages with read mmap_sem in munmap for large mapping Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ad7e1251-58f7-0903-18d0-646744c0665a@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox