From: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
Cc: Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, baohua@kernel.org,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, dev.jain@arm.com, hpa@zytor.com,
jannh@google.com, lance.yang@linux.dev,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, mingo@redhat.com,
npache@redhat.com, npiggin@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org,
riel@surriel.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, shy828301@gmail.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, will@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
ziy@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] x86/mm: implement redundant IPI elimination for
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 10:44:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad5563b6-95d9-4f3a-9f6f-ad7afe72c846@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251222031919.41964-1-ioworker0@gmail.com>
On 12/22/25 04:19, Lance Yang wrote:
> From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
>
>
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 14:08:07 +0100, David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) wrote:
>> On 12/13/25 09:00, Lance Yang wrote:
>>> From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
>>>
>>> Pass both freed_tables and unshared_tables to flush_tlb_mm_range() to
>>> ensure lazy-TLB CPUs receive IPIs and flush their paging-structure caches:
>>>
>>> flush_tlb_mm_range(..., freed_tables || unshared_tables);
>>>
>>> Implement tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast() for x86: on native x86
>>> without paravirt or INVLPGB, the TLB flush IPI already provides necessary
>>> synchronization, allowing the second IPI to be skipped. For paravirt with
>>> non-native flush_tlb_multi and for INVLPGB, conservatively keep both IPIs.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
>>> ---
>>> arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h
>>> index 866ea78ba156..96602b7b7210 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h
>>> @@ -5,10 +5,24 @@
>>> #define tlb_flush tlb_flush
>>> static inline void tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb);
>>>
>>> +#define tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast
>>> +static inline bool tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast(void);
>>> +
>>> #include <asm-generic/tlb.h>
>>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>> #include <vdso/bits.h>
>>> #include <vdso/page.h>
>>> +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
>>> +
>>> +static inline bool tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast(void)
>>> +{
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
>>> + /* Paravirt may use hypercalls that don't send real IPIs. */
>>> + if (pv_ops.mmu.flush_tlb_multi != native_flush_tlb_multi)
>>> + return false;
>>> +#endif
>>> + return !cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB);
>>
>> Right, here I was wondering whether we should have a new pv_ops callback
>> to indicate that instead.
>>
>> pv_ops.mmu.tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast()
>>
>> Or a simple boolean property that pv init code properly sets.
>
> Cool!
>
>>
>> Something for x86 folks to give suggestions for. :)
>
> I prefer to use a boolean property instead of comparing function pointers.
> Something like this:
>
> ----8<----
> diff --git a/arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c b/arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c
> index cfcb60468b01..90e9da33f2c7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c
> @@ -243,4 +243,5 @@ void hyperv_setup_mmu_ops(void)
>
> pr_info("Using hypercall for remote TLB flush\n");
> pv_ops.mmu.flush_tlb_multi = hyperv_flush_tlb_multi;
> + pv_ops.mmu.tlb_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast = false;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
> index 3502939415ad..f9756df6f3f6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
> @@ -133,6 +133,19 @@ struct pv_mmu_ops {
> void (*flush_tlb_multi)(const struct cpumask *cpus,
> const struct flush_tlb_info *info);
>
> + /*
> + * Indicates whether TLB flush IPIs provide sufficient synchronization
> + * for GUP-fast when freeing or unsharing page tables.
> + *
> + * Set to true only when the TLB flush guarantees:
> + * - IPIs reach all CPUs with potentially stale paging-structure caches
> + * - Synchronization with IRQ-disabled code like GUP-fast
> + *
> + * Paravirt implementations that use hypercalls (which may not send
> + * real IPIs) should set this to false.
> + */
> + bool tlb_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast;
> +
> /* Hook for intercepting the destruction of an mm_struct. */
> void (*exit_mmap)(struct mm_struct *mm);
> void (*notify_page_enc_status_changed)(unsigned long pfn, int npages, bool enc);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h
> index 96602b7b7210..9d20ad4786cc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ static inline bool tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast(void)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> /* Paravirt may use hypercalls that don't send real IPIs. */
> - if (pv_ops.mmu.flush_tlb_multi != native_flush_tlb_multi)
> + if (!pv_ops.mmu.tlb_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast)
> return false;
> #endif
> return !cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB);
I'd have thought that the X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB heck should then also be
taken care of by whoever sets tlb_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast.
--
Cheers
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-23 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-13 8:00 [PATCH RFC 0/3] skip redundant TLB sync IPIs Lance Yang
2025-12-13 8:00 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] mm/tlb: allow architectures to " Lance Yang
2025-12-15 5:48 ` Lance Yang
2025-12-18 13:08 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-13 8:00 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] x86/mm: implement redundant IPI elimination for PMD unsharing Lance Yang
2025-12-18 13:08 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-22 3:19 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] x86/mm: implement redundant IPI elimination for Lance Yang
2025-12-23 9:44 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) [this message]
2025-12-23 11:13 ` Lance Yang
2025-12-13 8:00 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] mm/khugepaged: skip redundant IPI in collapse_huge_page() Lance Yang
2025-12-18 13:13 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-18 14:35 ` Lance Yang
2025-12-19 8:25 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-21 10:43 ` Lance Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ad5563b6-95d9-4f3a-9f6f-ad7afe72c846@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox