From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,PDS_BAD_THREAD_QP_64, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9F4C433ED for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 03:28:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774EA6142D for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 03:28:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 774EA6142D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id EEC6B6B0070; Sun, 9 May 2021 23:28:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id E9B5B6B0071; Sun, 9 May 2021 23:28:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id D15106B0072; Sun, 9 May 2021 23:28:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0025.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.25]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18BE6B0070 for ; Sun, 9 May 2021 23:28:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin01.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7223B180AD81F for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 03:28:16 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78123888192.01.C6001D6 Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by imf08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C98380192E1 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 03:27:47 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: d+NwQ1+ugvMiUbN4Duh7wIpwfFBSrnauw8K+HmdJmwj6VD/WLSCMAgbm+QGAE3Y3is0CbYKaeV hCsm4JEw1Jxw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9979"; a="198779061" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,286,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="198779061" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 May 2021 20:28:09 -0700 IronPort-SDR: 3CDholy5BJ7Vmf/JABB6RxzlkV8ggywUriuMcaB/y7SyzqRMVjkN1ynKFnTrCSsiruMRTHwOG8 YCuSZX0e10mQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,286,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="390804963" Received: from fmsmsx605.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.85]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 May 2021 20:28:08 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx611.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.91) by fmsmsx605.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.85) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Sun, 9 May 2021 20:28:08 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx610.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.90) by fmsmsx611.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.91) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Sun, 9 May 2021 20:28:07 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx610.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.90]) by fmsmsx610.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.90]) with mapi id 15.01.2106.013; Sun, 9 May 2021 20:28:07 -0700 From: "Luck, Tony" To: Aili Yao , =?iso-2022-jp?B?SE9SSUdVQ0hJIE5BT1lBKBskQktZOH0hIUQ+TGkbKEIp?= CC: Naoya Horiguchi , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Andrew Morton , "Oscar Salvador" , David Hildenbrand , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Jue Wang , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "yaoaili126@gmail.com" Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 0/3] mm,hwpoison: fix sending SIGBUS for Action Required MCE Thread-Topic: [PATCH v3 0/3] mm,hwpoison: fix sending SIGBUS for Action Required MCE Thread-Index: AQHXNklUtDziI1+1ZUqZsXGvSliLyarXX3UAgAAW4VCAAJTpAIAAYa8A///72gCAAQaCAIACu56g Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 03:28:07 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20210421005728.1994268-1-nao.horiguchi@gmail.com> <87ba79daaba1416589b203118be096cb@intel.com> <20210507052422.GB2158342@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> <20210507191400.6258dee6@alex-virtual-machine> <20210508103842.7dc6e8b1@alex-virtual-machine> In-Reply-To: <20210508103842.7dc6e8b1@alex-virtual-machine> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 x-originating-ip: [10.1.200.100] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 3C98380192E1 Authentication-Results: imf08.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=none (imf08.hostedemail.com: domain of tony.luck@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 192.55.52.115) smtp.mailfrom=tony.luck@intel.com; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=intel.com (policy=none) X-Stat-Signature: 87nj1u1j6ub9k9qjetye3s83ykp7myi9 Received-SPF: none (intel.com>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf08; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mga14.intel.com; client-ip=192.55.52.115 X-HE-DKIM-Result: none/none X-HE-Tag: 1620617267-828192 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: > Sorry, I am not sure if the stress test in my server is same with yours. It's better if you test different things ... that's how we get better cover= age. > Usually, I will do one RAS stress test from mce-test/cases/stress before = post something. > Maybe this test is not general useful or you have tested it and passed or= you may think > the test is not proper though or you tested and you don't think it's one = real issue, > then just ignore it please. I haven't re-run the mce-test cases for a while. The test that was run on t= hese patches involves a multi-threaded application running on all logical CPUs. When poi= son is injected many of the CPUs can hit the poison close together. So it's a good stress t= est for the new series. -Tony