From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
muchun.song@linux.dev, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, corbet@lwn.net,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, hughd@google.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, peterx@redhat.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] hugetlb: make hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash() take PAGE_SIZE index
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 19:43:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad0rUB4FuNUOJ1pN@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260409234158.837786-4-jane.chu@oracle.com>
On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 05:41:54PM -0600, Jane Chu wrote:
> hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash() is used to serialize faults and page cache
> operations on the same hugetlb file offset. The helper currently expects
> its index argument in hugetlb page granularity, so callers have to
> open-code conversions from the PAGE_SIZE-based indices commonly used
> in the rest of MM helpers.
>
> Change hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash() to take a PAGE_SIZE-based index
> instead, and perform the hugetlb-granularity conversion inside the helper.
> Update all callers accordingly.
>
> This makes the helper interface consistent with filemap_get_folio(),
> and linear_page_index(), while preserving the same lock selection for
> a given hugetlb file offset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
> mm/hugetlb.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
> mm/memfd.c | 11 ++++++-----
> mm/userfaultfd.c | 7 +++----
> 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> index cf79fb830377..e24e9bf54e14 100644
> --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static void remove_inode_hugepages(struct inode *inode, loff_t lstart,
> struct address_space *mapping = &inode->i_data;
> const pgoff_t end = lend >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> struct folio_batch fbatch;
> - pgoff_t next, index;
> + pgoff_t next, idx;
> int i, freed = 0;
> bool truncate_op = (lend == LLONG_MAX);
>
> @@ -586,15 +586,15 @@ static void remove_inode_hugepages(struct inode *inode, loff_t lstart,
> struct folio *folio = fbatch.folios[i];
> u32 hash = 0;
>
> - index = folio->index >> huge_page_order(h);
> - hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(mapping, index);
> + hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(mapping, folio->index);
> mutex_lock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
>
> /*
> * Remove folio that was part of folio_batch.
> */
> + idx = folio->index >> huge_page_order(h);
> remove_inode_single_folio(h, inode, mapping, folio,
> - index, truncate_op);
> + idx, truncate_op);
Since this is the only place we call remove_inode_single_folio(), and that we do not
the index (at least index >> huge_page_order()) directly in this function, would it not be
better to make remove_inode_single_folio do the conversion itself?
Also, I am thinking out loud here but we do have a few places where we
go: idx = index >> huge_page_order() to convert it into hugepage units, but the casual
reader might be a bit puzzled about that.
So, would it be worth to have implement an inline helper with an accurate name
to do that? It might help whoever reads that?
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-13 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-09 23:41 [PATCH 0/6] hugetlb: normalize exported interfaces to use base-page indices Jane Chu
2026-04-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] hugetlb: open-code hugetlb folio lookup index conversion Jane Chu
2026-04-11 14:14 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-04-13 16:39 ` jane.chu
2026-04-13 16:22 ` Oscar Salvador
2026-04-13 16:30 ` jane.chu
2026-04-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] hugetlb: remove the hugetlb_linear_page_index() helper Jane Chu
2026-04-13 16:48 ` Oscar Salvador
2026-04-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] hugetlb: make hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash() take PAGE_SIZE index Jane Chu
2026-04-10 11:24 ` Usama Arif
2026-04-10 17:51 ` jane.chu
2026-04-13 17:43 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2026-04-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] hugetlb: drop vma_hugecache_offset() in favor of linear_page_index() Jane Chu
2026-04-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] hugetlb: make hugetlb_add_to_page_cache() use PAGE_SIZE-based index Jane Chu
2026-04-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] hugetlb: pass hugetlb reservation ranges in base-page indices Jane Chu
2026-04-10 6:45 ` [syzbot ci] Re: hugetlb: normalize exported interfaces to use " syzbot ci
2026-04-10 21:54 ` jane.chu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ad0rUB4FuNUOJ1pN@localhost.localdomain \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox