From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
To: Sagi Shahar <sagis@google.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
Ryan Afranji <afranji@google.com>,
Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>,
Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
Roger Wang <runanwang@google.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
jmattson@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 28/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX UPM selftest
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 12:57:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ace89472-2d10-47c3-bf6d-232602b689f6@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231212204647.2170650-29-sagis@google.com>
On 12/13/2023 4:46 AM, Sagi Shahar wrote:
> From: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
>
> This tests the use of guest memory with explicit MapGPA calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Afranji <afranji@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sagi Shahar <sagis@google.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
> .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_upm_test.c | 401 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 402 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_upm_test.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> index 8c0a6b395ee5..2f2669af15d6 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += kvm_binary_stats_test
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += system_counter_offset_test
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/tdx_vm_tests
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/tdx_shared_mem_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/tdx_upm_test
>
> # Compiled outputs used by test targets
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED_x86_64 += x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_upm_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_upm_test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..44671874a4f1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_upm_test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,401 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +
> +#include <asm/kvm.h>
> +#include <asm/vmx.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm.h>
> +#include <stdbool.h>
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +
> +#include "kvm_util_base.h"
> +#include "processor.h"
> +#include "tdx/tdcall.h"
> +#include "tdx/tdx.h"
> +#include "tdx/tdx_util.h"
> +#include "tdx/test_util.h"
> +#include "test_util.h"
> +
> +/* TDX UPM test patterns */
> +#define PATTERN_CONFIDENCE_CHECK (0x11)
> +#define PATTERN_HOST_FOCUS (0x22)
> +#define PATTERN_GUEST_GENERAL (0x33)
> +#define PATTERN_GUEST_FOCUS (0x44)
> +
> +/*
> + * 0x80000000 is arbitrarily selected. The selected address need not be the same
> + * as TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_GVA_PRIVATE, but it should not overlap with selftest
> + * code or boot page.
> + */
> +#define TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_GPA (0x80000000)
> +/* Test area GPA is arbitrarily selected */
> +#define TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_GVA_PRIVATE (0x90000000)
> +/* Select any bit that can be used as a flag */
> +#define TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_GVA_SHARED_BIT (32)
> +/*
> + * TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_GVA_SHARED is used to map the same GPA twice into the
> + * guest, once as shared and once as private
> + */
> +#define TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_GVA_SHARED \
> + (TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_GVA_PRIVATE | \
> + BIT_ULL(TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_GVA_SHARED_BIT))
> +
> +/* The test area is 2MB in size */
> +#define TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_SIZE (2 << 20)
> +/* 0th general area is 1MB in size */
> +#define TDX_UPM_GENERAL_AREA_0_SIZE (1 << 20)
> +/* Focus area is 40KB in size */
> +#define TDX_UPM_FOCUS_AREA_SIZE (40 << 10)
> +/* 1st general area is the rest of the space in the test area */
> +#define TDX_UPM_GENERAL_AREA_1_SIZE \
> + (TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_SIZE - TDX_UPM_GENERAL_AREA_0_SIZE - \
> + TDX_UPM_FOCUS_AREA_SIZE)
> +
> +/*
> + * The test memory area is set up as two general areas, sandwiching a focus
> + * area. The general areas act as control areas. After they are filled, they
> + * are not expected to change throughout the tests. The focus area is memory
> + * permissions change from private to shared and vice-versa.
> + *
> + * The focus area is intentionally small, and sandwiched to test that when the
> + * focus area's permissions change, the other areas' permissions are not
> + * affected.
> + */
> +struct __packed tdx_upm_test_area {
> + uint8_t general_area_0[TDX_UPM_GENERAL_AREA_0_SIZE];
> + uint8_t focus_area[TDX_UPM_FOCUS_AREA_SIZE];
> + uint8_t general_area_1[TDX_UPM_GENERAL_AREA_1_SIZE];
> +};
> +
> +static void fill_test_area(struct tdx_upm_test_area *test_area_base,
> + uint8_t pattern)
> +{
> + memset(test_area_base, pattern, sizeof(*test_area_base));
> +}
> +
> +static void fill_focus_area(struct tdx_upm_test_area *test_area_base,
> + uint8_t pattern)
> +{
> + memset(test_area_base->focus_area, pattern,
> + sizeof(test_area_base->focus_area));
> +}
> +
> +static bool check_area(uint8_t *base, uint64_t size, uint8_t expected_pattern)
> +{
> + size_t i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> + if (base[i] != expected_pattern)
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool check_general_areas(struct tdx_upm_test_area *test_area_base,
> + uint8_t expected_pattern)
> +{
> + return (check_area(test_area_base->general_area_0,
> + sizeof(test_area_base->general_area_0),
> + expected_pattern) &&
> + check_area(test_area_base->general_area_1,
> + sizeof(test_area_base->general_area_1),
> + expected_pattern));
> +}
> +
> +static bool check_focus_area(struct tdx_upm_test_area *test_area_base,
> + uint8_t expected_pattern)
> +{
> + return check_area(test_area_base->focus_area,
> + sizeof(test_area_base->focus_area), expected_pattern);
> +}
> +
> +static bool check_test_area(struct tdx_upm_test_area *test_area_base,
> + uint8_t expected_pattern)
> +{
> + return (check_general_areas(test_area_base, expected_pattern) &&
> + check_focus_area(test_area_base, expected_pattern));
> +}
> +
> +static bool fill_and_check(struct tdx_upm_test_area *test_area_base, uint8_t pattern)
> +{
> + fill_test_area(test_area_base, pattern);
> +
> + return check_test_area(test_area_base, pattern);
> +}
> +
> +#define TDX_UPM_TEST_ASSERT(x) \
> + do { \
> + if (!(x)) \
> + tdx_test_fatal(__LINE__); \
> + } while (0)
> +
> +/*
> + * Shared variables between guest and host
> + */
> +static struct tdx_upm_test_area *test_area_gpa_private;
> +static struct tdx_upm_test_area *test_area_gpa_shared;
> +
> +/*
> + * Test stages for syncing with host
> + */
> +enum {
> + SYNC_CHECK_READ_PRIVATE_MEMORY_FROM_HOST = 1,
> + SYNC_CHECK_READ_SHARED_MEMORY_FROM_HOST,
> + SYNC_CHECK_READ_PRIVATE_MEMORY_FROM_HOST_AGAIN,
> +};
> +
> +#define TDX_UPM_TEST_ACCEPT_PRINT_PORT 0x87
> +
> +/**
> + * Does vcpu_run, and also manages memory conversions if requested by the TD.
> + */
> +void vcpu_run_and_manage_memory_conversions(struct kvm_vm *vm,
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + for (;;) {
> + vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + if (vcpu->run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_TDX &&
> + vcpu->run->tdx.type == KVM_EXIT_TDX_VMCALL &&
> + vcpu->run->tdx.u.vmcall.subfunction == TDG_VP_VMCALL_MAP_GPA) {
> + struct kvm_tdx_vmcall *vmcall_info = &vcpu->run->tdx.u.vmcall;
> + uint64_t gpa = vmcall_info->in_r12 & ~vm->arch.s_bit;
> +
> + handle_memory_conversion(vm, gpa, vmcall_info->in_r13,
> + !(vm->arch.s_bit & vmcall_info->in_r12));
> + vmcall_info->status_code = 0;
> + continue;
> + } else if (
> + vcpu->run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO &&
> + vcpu->run->io.port == TDX_UPM_TEST_ACCEPT_PRINT_PORT) {
> + uint64_t gpa = tdx_test_read_64bit(
> + vcpu, TDX_UPM_TEST_ACCEPT_PRINT_PORT);
> + printf("\t ... guest accepting 1 page at GPA: 0x%lx\n", gpa);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void guest_upm_explicit(void)
> +{
> + uint64_t ret = 0;
> + uint64_t failed_gpa;
> +
> + struct tdx_upm_test_area *test_area_gva_private =
> + (struct tdx_upm_test_area *)TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_GVA_PRIVATE;
> + struct tdx_upm_test_area *test_area_gva_shared =
> + (struct tdx_upm_test_area *)TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_GVA_SHARED;
> +
> + /* Check: host reading private memory does not modify guest's view */
> + fill_test_area(test_area_gva_private, PATTERN_GUEST_GENERAL);
> +
> + tdx_test_report_to_user_space(SYNC_CHECK_READ_PRIVATE_MEMORY_FROM_HOST);
> +
> + TDX_UPM_TEST_ASSERT(
> + check_test_area(test_area_gva_private, PATTERN_GUEST_GENERAL));
> +
> + /* Remap focus area as shared */
> + ret = tdg_vp_vmcall_map_gpa((uint64_t)test_area_gpa_shared->focus_area,
> + sizeof(test_area_gpa_shared->focus_area),
> + &failed_gpa);
> + TDX_UPM_TEST_ASSERT(!ret);
> +
> + /* General areas should be unaffected by remapping */
> + TDX_UPM_TEST_ASSERT(
> + check_general_areas(test_area_gva_private, PATTERN_GUEST_GENERAL));
> +
> + /*
> + * Use memory contents to confirm that the memory allocated using mmap
> + * is used as backing memory for shared memory - PATTERN_CONFIDENCE_CHECK
> + * was written by the VMM at the beginning of this test.
> + */
> + TDX_UPM_TEST_ASSERT(
> + check_focus_area(test_area_gva_shared, PATTERN_CONFIDENCE_CHECK));
> +
> + /* Guest can use focus area after remapping as shared */
> + fill_focus_area(test_area_gva_shared, PATTERN_GUEST_FOCUS);
> +
> + tdx_test_report_to_user_space(SYNC_CHECK_READ_SHARED_MEMORY_FROM_HOST);
> +
> + /* Check that guest has the same view of shared memory */
> + TDX_UPM_TEST_ASSERT(
> + check_focus_area(test_area_gva_shared, PATTERN_HOST_FOCUS));
> +
> + /* Remap focus area back to private */
> + ret = tdg_vp_vmcall_map_gpa((uint64_t)test_area_gpa_private->focus_area,
> + sizeof(test_area_gpa_private->focus_area),
> + &failed_gpa);
> + TDX_UPM_TEST_ASSERT(!ret);
> +
> + /* General areas should be unaffected by remapping */
> + TDX_UPM_TEST_ASSERT(
> + check_general_areas(test_area_gva_private, PATTERN_GUEST_GENERAL));
> +
> + /* Focus area should be zeroed after remapping */
> + TDX_UPM_TEST_ASSERT(check_focus_area(test_area_gva_private, 0));
> +
> + tdx_test_report_to_user_space(SYNC_CHECK_READ_PRIVATE_MEMORY_FROM_HOST_AGAIN);
> +
> + /* Check that guest can use private memory after focus area is remapped as private */
> + TDX_UPM_TEST_ASSERT(
> + fill_and_check(test_area_gva_private, PATTERN_GUEST_GENERAL));
> +
> + tdx_test_success();
> +}
> +
> +static void run_selftest(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + struct tdx_upm_test_area *test_area_base_hva)
> +{
> + vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_CHECK_GUEST_FAILURE(vcpu);
This check seems to be a vain.
> + TDX_TEST_ASSERT_IO(vcpu, TDX_TEST_REPORT_PORT, TDX_TEST_REPORT_SIZE,
> + TDG_VP_VMCALL_INSTRUCTION_IO_WRITE);
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(*(uint32_t *)((void *)vcpu->run + vcpu->run->io.data_offset),
> + SYNC_CHECK_READ_PRIVATE_MEMORY_FROM_HOST);
> +
> + /*
> + * Check that host should read PATTERN_CONFIDENCE_CHECK from guest's
> + * private memory.
I think this description is confusing.
It's not actually accessing guest's private memory.
> This confirms that regular memory (userspace_addr in
> + * struct kvm_userspace_memory_region) is used to back the host's view
> + * of private memory, since PATTERN_CONFIDENCE_CHECK was written to that
> + * memory before starting the guest.
> + */
> + TEST_ASSERT(check_test_area(test_area_base_hva, PATTERN_CONFIDENCE_CHECK),
> + "Host should read PATTERN_CONFIDENCE_CHECK from guest's private memory.");
> +
> + vcpu_run_and_manage_memory_conversions(vm, vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_CHECK_GUEST_FAILURE(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_ASSERT_IO(vcpu, TDX_TEST_REPORT_PORT, TDX_TEST_REPORT_SIZE,
> + TDG_VP_VMCALL_INSTRUCTION_IO_WRITE);
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(*(uint32_t *)((void *)vcpu->run + vcpu->run->io.data_offset),
> + SYNC_CHECK_READ_SHARED_MEMORY_FROM_HOST);
> +
> + TEST_ASSERT(check_focus_area(test_area_base_hva, PATTERN_GUEST_FOCUS),
> + "Host should have the same view of shared memory as guest.");
> + TEST_ASSERT(check_general_areas(test_area_base_hva, PATTERN_CONFIDENCE_CHECK),
> + "Host's view of private memory should still be backed by regular memory.");
> +
> + /* Check that host can use shared memory */
> + fill_focus_area(test_area_base_hva, PATTERN_HOST_FOCUS);
> + TEST_ASSERT(check_focus_area(test_area_base_hva, PATTERN_HOST_FOCUS),
> + "Host should be able to use shared memory.");
> +
> + vcpu_run_and_manage_memory_conversions(vm, vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_CHECK_GUEST_FAILURE(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_ASSERT_IO(vcpu, TDX_TEST_REPORT_PORT, TDX_TEST_REPORT_SIZE,
> + TDG_VP_VMCALL_INSTRUCTION_IO_WRITE);
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(*(uint32_t *)((void *)vcpu->run + vcpu->run->io.data_offset),
> + SYNC_CHECK_READ_PRIVATE_MEMORY_FROM_HOST_AGAIN);
> +
> + TEST_ASSERT(check_general_areas(test_area_base_hva, PATTERN_CONFIDENCE_CHECK),
> + "Host's view of private memory should be backed by regular memory.");
> + TEST_ASSERT(check_focus_area(test_area_base_hva, PATTERN_HOST_FOCUS),
> + "Host's view of private memory should be backed by regular memory.");
> +
> + vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_CHECK_GUEST_FAILURE(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(vcpu);
> +
> + printf("\t ... PASSED\n");
> +}
> +
> +static bool address_between(uint64_t addr, void *lo, void *hi)
> +{
> + return (uint64_t)lo <= addr && addr < (uint64_t)hi;
> +}
> +
> +static void guest_ve_handler(struct ex_regs *regs)
> +{
> + uint64_t ret;
> + struct ve_info ve;
> +
> + ret = tdg_vp_veinfo_get(&ve);
> + TDX_UPM_TEST_ASSERT(!ret);
> +
> + /* For this test, we will only handle EXIT_REASON_EPT_VIOLATION */
> + TDX_UPM_TEST_ASSERT(ve.exit_reason == EXIT_REASON_EPT_VIOLATION);
> +
> + /* Validate GPA in fault */
> + TDX_UPM_TEST_ASSERT(
> + address_between(ve.gpa,
> + test_area_gpa_private->focus_area,
> + test_area_gpa_private->general_area_1));
> +
> + tdx_test_send_64bit(TDX_UPM_TEST_ACCEPT_PRINT_PORT, ve.gpa);
> +
> +#define MEM_PAGE_ACCEPT_LEVEL_4K 0
> +#define MEM_PAGE_ACCEPT_LEVEL_2M 1
> + ret = tdg_mem_page_accept(ve.gpa, MEM_PAGE_ACCEPT_LEVEL_4K);
> + TDX_UPM_TEST_ASSERT(!ret);
> +}
> +
> +static void verify_upm_test(void)
> +{
> + struct kvm_vm *vm;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +
> + vm_vaddr_t test_area_gva_private;
> + struct tdx_upm_test_area *test_area_base_hva;
> + uint64_t test_area_npages;
> +
> + vm = td_create();
> + td_initialize(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, 0);
> + vcpu = td_vcpu_add(vm, 0, guest_upm_explicit);
> +
> + vm_install_exception_handler(vm, VE_VECTOR, guest_ve_handler);
> +
> + /*
> + * Set up shared memory page for testing by first allocating as private
> + * and then mapping the same GPA again as shared. This way, the TD does
> + * not have to remap its page tables at runtime.
> + */
> + test_area_npages = TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_SIZE / vm->page_size;
> + vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm,
> + VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_GPA,
> + 3, test_area_npages, KVM_MEM_PRIVATE);
> +
> + test_area_gva_private = ____vm_vaddr_alloc(
> + vm, TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_SIZE, TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_GVA_PRIVATE,
> + TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_GPA, 3, true);
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(test_area_gva_private, TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_GVA_PRIVATE);
> +
> + test_area_gpa_private = (struct tdx_upm_test_area *)
> + addr_gva2gpa(vm, test_area_gva_private);
> + virt_map_shared(vm, TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_GVA_SHARED,
> + (uint64_t)test_area_gpa_private,
> + test_area_npages);
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(addr_gva2gpa(vm, TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_GVA_SHARED),
> + (vm_paddr_t)test_area_gpa_private);
> +
> + test_area_base_hva = addr_gva2hva(vm, TDX_UPM_TEST_AREA_GVA_PRIVATE);
> +
> + TEST_ASSERT(fill_and_check(test_area_base_hva, PATTERN_CONFIDENCE_CHECK),
> + "Failed to mark memory intended as backing memory for TD shared memory");
> +
> + sync_global_to_guest(vm, test_area_gpa_private);
> + test_area_gpa_shared = (struct tdx_upm_test_area *)
> + ((uint64_t)test_area_gpa_private | BIT_ULL(vm->pa_bits - 1));
> + sync_global_to_guest(vm, test_area_gpa_shared);
> +
> + td_finalize(vm);
> +
> + printf("Verifying UPM functionality: explicit MapGPA\n");
> +
> + run_selftest(vm, vcpu, test_area_base_hva);
> +
> + kvm_vm_free(vm);
> +}
> +
> +int main(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> + /* Disable stdout buffering */
> + setbuf(stdout, NULL);
> +
> + if (!is_tdx_enabled()) {
> + printf("TDX is not supported by the KVM\n"
> + "Skipping the TDX tests.\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + run_in_new_process(&verify_upm_test);
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-05 4:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-12 20:46 [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 01/29] KVM: selftests: Add function to allow one-to-one GVA to GPA mappings Sagi Shahar
2024-02-21 1:43 ` Binbin Wu
2024-07-23 19:55 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-03-21 22:29 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2024-07-23 19:56 ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 02/29] KVM: selftests: Expose function that sets up sregs based on VM's mode Sagi Shahar
2024-02-21 2:18 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 03/29] KVM: selftests: Store initial stack address in struct kvm_vcpu Sagi Shahar
2024-02-21 2:29 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 04/29] KVM: selftests: Refactor steps in vCPU descriptor table initialization Sagi Shahar
2024-02-21 5:43 ` Binbin Wu
2024-07-23 21:25 ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 05/29] KVM: selftests: Add helper functions to create TDX VMs Sagi Shahar
2024-02-22 9:24 ` Yan Zhao
2024-02-28 16:19 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-21 22:54 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2024-04-12 5:34 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 06/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Use KVM_TDX_CAPABILITIES to validate TDs' attribute configuration Sagi Shahar
2024-02-29 8:31 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 07/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Update load_td_memory_region for VM memory backed by guest memfd Sagi Shahar
2024-02-22 9:19 ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-24 16:42 ` Ackerley Tng
2024-07-25 18:19 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 08/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX lifecycle test Sagi Shahar
2024-02-23 1:55 ` Chen Yu
2024-03-01 4:58 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-01 7:36 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-21 23:20 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2024-04-12 4:42 ` Ackerley Tng
2024-03-22 21:33 ` Chen, Zide
2024-07-25 19:52 ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 09/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add report_fatal_error test Sagi Shahar
2024-02-29 12:31 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-01 6:52 ` Binbin Wu
2024-07-25 20:37 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 12:09 ` Yan Zhao
2024-04-12 4:56 ` Ackerley Tng
2024-04-12 11:57 ` Yan Zhao
2024-04-15 8:05 ` Ackerley Tng
2024-04-15 10:09 ` Yan Zhao
2024-04-16 18:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-17 22:41 ` Yan Zhao
2024-04-22 21:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-07-28 11:16 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 10/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Adding test case for TDX port IO Sagi Shahar
2024-02-29 13:20 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-04 2:19 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-04 9:16 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-04 9:18 ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-25 22:35 ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 11/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add basic TDX CPUID test Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 12/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add basic get_td_vmcall_info test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 6:03 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 13/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX IO writes test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 6:55 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 14/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX IO reads test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 8:22 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 15/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX MSR read/write tests Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 12:00 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-01 12:09 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-05 0:22 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-21 23:40 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 16/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX HLT exit test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-02 7:31 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-05 5:40 ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-27 23:23 ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 17/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX MMIO reads test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-05 7:09 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-21 23:45 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 18/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX MMIO writes test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-02 7:58 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-05 8:58 ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-30 19:03 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-03-21 23:46 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 19/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX CPUID TDVMCALL test Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 20/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Verify the behavior when host consumes a TD private memory Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 21/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDG.VP.INFO test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-06 4:50 ` Yan Zhao
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 22/29] KVM: selftests: Add functions to allow mapping as shared Sagi Shahar
2024-03-05 11:09 ` Yan Zhao
[not found] ` <DS7PR11MB7886BD37E5E56DAB9A0087A3F6292@DS7PR11MB7886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2024-03-16 6:24 ` Chen, Zide
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 23/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add shared memory test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 12:02 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-06 1:36 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-06 1:20 ` Yan Zhao
[not found] ` <DS7PR11MB7886AA5F8A19CDFCB5566B0EF6292@DS7PR11MB7886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2024-03-16 6:24 ` Chen, Zide
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 24/29] KVM: selftests: Expose _vm_vaddr_alloc Sagi Shahar
2024-03-04 9:55 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-06 1:49 ` Yan Zhao
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 25/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add support for TDG.MEM.PAGE.ACCEPT Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 26/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add support for TDG.VP.VEINFO.GET Sagi Shahar
2024-03-04 13:56 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 27/29] KVM: selftests: Propagate KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT to userspace Sagi Shahar
[not found] ` <DS7PR11MB78860170A5FD77253573BC09F6292@DS7PR11MB7886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2024-03-14 21:46 ` Chen, Zide
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 28/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX UPM selftest Sagi Shahar
2024-03-05 4:57 ` Binbin Wu [this message]
2024-03-06 8:54 ` Yan Zhao
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 29/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX UPM selftests for implicit conversion Sagi Shahar
2024-06-05 18:38 ` [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests Verma, Vishal L
2024-06-05 20:10 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-06-05 20:15 ` Verma, Vishal L
2024-06-05 20:18 ` Verma, Vishal L
2024-06-05 20:42 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-06-05 20:56 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-05 21:34 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-06-05 21:44 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-21 2:51 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-21 20:52 ` Sagi Shahar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ace89472-2d10-47c3-bf6d-232602b689f6@linux.intel.com \
--to=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=afranji@google.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=erdemaktas@google.com \
--cc=haibo1.xu@intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=runanwang@google.com \
--cc=sagis@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox