From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: vbabka@suse.cz, mhocko@kernel.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 0/2] mm: mempolicy: fix mbind()'s inconsistent behavior for unmovable pages
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:54:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac6df169-84cd-b3e4-f1e4-b82b4cb60da3@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <600c7713-2a6a-efce-69e6-9519d6aafaf1@linux.alibaba.com>
On 7/15/19 4:51 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
>
>
> On 7/15/19 3:22 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 08:20:07 +0800 Yang Shi
>> <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Changelog
>>> v2: * Fixed the inconsistent behavior by not aborting !vma_migratable()
>>> immediately by a separate patch (patch 1/2), and this is also
>>> the
>>> preparation for patch 2/2. For the details please see the commit
>>> log. Per Vlastimil.
>>> * Not abort immediately if unmovable page is met. This should
>>> handle
>>> non-LRU movable pages and temporary off-LRU pages more friendly.
>>> Per Vlastimil and Michal Hocko.
>>>
>>> Yang Shi (2):
>>> mm: mempolicy: make the behavior consistent when
>>> MPOL_MF_MOVE* and MPOL_MF_STRICT were specified
>>> mm: mempolicy: handle vma with unmovable pages mapped
>>> correctly in mbind
>>>
>> I'm seeing no evidence of review on these two. Could we please take a
>> look? 2/2 fixes a kernel crash so let's please also think about the
>> -stable situation.
>
> Thanks for following up this. It seems I have a few patches stalled
> due to lack of review.
>
> BTW, this would not crash post-4.9 kernel since that BUG_ON had been
> removed. But, that behavior is definitely problematic as the commit
> log elaborated.
>
>>
>> I have a note here that Vlastimil had an issue with [1/2] but I seem to
>> hae misplaced that email :(
Vlastimil suggested something for v1, then I think his concern and
suggestion have been solved in this version. But, the review was stalled.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-15 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-22 0:20 Yang Shi
2019-06-22 0:20 ` [v2 PATCH 1/2] mm: mempolicy: make the behavior consistent when MPOL_MF_MOVE* and MPOL_MF_STRICT were specified Yang Shi
2019-07-16 8:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-07-16 8:47 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-07-16 17:19 ` Yang Shi
2019-07-16 17:18 ` Yang Shi
2019-07-17 10:55 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-07-17 16:51 ` Yang Shi
2019-06-22 0:20 ` [v2 PATCH 2/2] mm: mempolicy: handle vma with unmovable pages mapped correctly in mbind Yang Shi
2019-07-16 12:07 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-07-16 17:28 ` Yang Shi
2019-07-17 18:23 ` Yang Shi
2019-07-17 18:39 ` Yang Shi
2019-07-17 18:50 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-07-17 19:25 ` Yang Shi
2019-07-15 22:22 ` [v2 PATCH 0/2] mm: mempolicy: fix mbind()'s inconsistent behavior for unmovable pages Andrew Morton
2019-07-15 23:51 ` Yang Shi
2019-07-15 23:54 ` Yang Shi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac6df169-84cd-b3e4-f1e4-b82b4cb60da3@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox