From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: npiggin@suse.de, akpm@osdl.org, jeremy@goop.org,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, tmem-devel@oss.oracle.com,
kurt.hackel@oracle.com, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave.mccracken@oracle.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, chris.mason@oracle.com,
sunil.mushran@oracle.com, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] (Take 2): transcendent memory ("tmem") for Linux
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:31:29 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac5dec0d-e593-4a82-8c9d-8aa374e8c6ed@default> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A55243B.8090001@codemonkey.ws>
Hi Anthony --
Thanks for the comments.
> I have trouble mapping this to a VMM capable of overcommit
> without just coming back to CMM2.
>
> In CMM2 parlance, ephemeral tmem pools is just normal kernel memory
> marked in the volatile state, no?
They are similar in concept, but a volatile-marked kernel page
is still a kernel page, can be changed by a kernel (or user)
store instruction, and counts as part of the memory used
by the VM. An ephemeral tmem page cannot be directly written
by a kernel (or user) store, can only be read via a "get" (which
may or may not succeed), and doesn't count against the memory
used by the VM (even though it likely contains -- for awhile --
data useful to the VM).
> It seems to me that an architecture built around hinting
> would be more
> robust than having to use separate memory pools for this type
> of memory
> (especially since you are requiring a copy to/from the pool).
Depends on what you mean by robust, I suppose. Once you
understand the basics of tmem, it is very simple and this
is borne out in the low invasiveness of the Linux patch.
Simplicity is another form of robustness.
> For instance, you can mark data DMA'd from disk (perhaps by
> read-ahead)
> as volatile without ever bringing it into the CPU cache.
> With tmem, if
> you wanted to use a tmem pool for all of the page cache, you'd likely
> suffer significant overhead due to copying.
The copy may be expensive on an older machine, but on newer
machines copying a page is relatively inexpensive. On a reasonable
multi-VM-kernbench-like benchmark I'll be presenting at Linux
Symposium next week, the overhead is on the order of 0.01%
for a fairly significant savings in IOs.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-08 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-07 16:17 Dan Magenheimer
2009-07-07 17:28 ` Rik van Riel
2009-07-07 19:53 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-07-08 22:56 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-08 23:31 ` Dan Magenheimer [this message]
2009-07-08 23:57 ` [Xen-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2009-07-09 0:17 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-07-09 0:27 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-09 1:20 ` Rik van Riel
2009-07-09 21:09 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-07-09 21:27 ` Rik van Riel
2009-07-09 21:48 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-07-09 21:41 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-09 22:34 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-07-09 22:45 ` Rik van Riel
2009-07-09 23:33 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 15:23 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-07-12 9:20 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-12 16:28 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-07-12 17:27 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-12 20:59 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-07-12 13:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-12 16:20 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-07-12 17:16 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-12 19:34 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-13 20:17 ` Chris Mason
2009-07-13 20:38 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-13 21:01 ` Chris Mason
2009-07-13 21:17 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-26 15:00 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-13 20:38 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-12 20:39 ` [Xen-devel] " Dan Magenheimer
2009-07-12 20:43 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-12 21:08 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-07-13 11:33 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac5dec0d-e593-4a82-8c9d-8aa374e8c6ed@default \
--to=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=dave.mccracken@oracle.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=kurt.hackel@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sunil.mushran@oracle.com \
--cc=tmem-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox