From: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [bpf, x64] f663a03c8e: test-bpf.Tail_call_count_preserved_across_function_calls.fail
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:25:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac402815-923c-49ec-b027-4f99b55c895e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202406251415.c51865bc-oliver.sang@intel.com>
On 25/6/24 14:55, kernel test robot wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> kernel test robot noticed "test-bpf.Tail_call_count_preserved_across_function_calls.fail" on:
>
> commit: f663a03c8e35c5156bad073a4a8f5e673d656e3f ("bpf, x64: Remove tail call detection")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
>
> [test failed on linux-next/master 62c97045b8f720c2eac807a5f38e26c9ed512371]
>
> in testcase: test-bpf
> version:
> with following parameters:
>
> test: non-jit
>
>
>
> compiler: gcc-13
> test machine: 36 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10980XE CPU @ 3.00GHz (Cascade Lake) with 32G memory
>
> (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
>
>
>
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202406251415.c51865bc-oliver.sang@intel.com
>
>
>
> [ 43.913560] test_bpf: #0 Tail call leaf jited:1 5 PASS
> [ 43.913572] test_bpf: #1 Tail call 2 jited:1 ret -1 != 3 FAIL
> [ 43.914138] test_bpf: #2 Tail call 3 jited:1 ret -1 != 6 FAIL
> [ 43.914756] test_bpf: #3 Tail call 4 jited:1 ret -1 != 10 FAIL
> [ 43.915374] test_bpf: #4 Tail call load/store leaf jited:1 5 PASS
> [ 43.915993] test_bpf: #5 Tail call load/store jited:1 ret -1 != 0 FAIL
> [ 43.916636] test_bpf: #6 Tail call error path, max count reached jited:1 ret 1000 != 34000 FAIL
> [ 43.917319] test_bpf: #7 Tail call count preserved across function calls jited:1 ret 1000 != 34000 FAIL
> [ 43.918799] test_bpf: #8 Tail call error path, NULL target jited:1 5 PASS
> [ 43.919720] test_bpf: #9 Tail call error path, index out of range jited:1 5 PASS
> [ 43.920474] test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 4 PASSED, 6 FAILED, [10/10 JIT'ed]
>
Hi,
May I request the source code of these test cases?
I do not find them in lkp-tests.
Thanks,
Leon
>
>
> The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
> https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240625/202406251415.c51865bc-oliver.sang@intel.com
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-25 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-25 6:55 kernel test robot
2024-06-25 8:25 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2024-06-26 2:19 ` Oliver Sang
2024-06-26 2:43 ` Leon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac402815-923c-49ec-b027-4f99b55c895e@gmail.com \
--to=hffilwlqm@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox