From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD9DC433F5 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 06:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 1C0386B0071; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 01:27:41 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 16FF66B0072; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 01:27:41 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 036C66B0073; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 01:27:40 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0191.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.191]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77766B0071 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 01:27:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin20.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD108A3C5 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 06:27:30 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78864615060.20.7AEE46A Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com (szxga08-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.255]) by imf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23F17001A0A for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 06:27:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dggpemm500022.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4J3Byk5GSHz1DJpF; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:24:46 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) by dggpemm500022.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.162) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:27:26 +0800 Received: from [10.174.177.243] (10.174.177.243) by dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:27:25 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:27:24 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/4] mm: percpu: Add generic pcpu_fc_alloc/free funciton Content-Language: en-US To: Dennis Zhou CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20211121093557.139034-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> <20211121093557.139034-4-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> From: Kefeng Wang In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed X-Originating-IP: [10.174.177.243] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggeme704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.100) To dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A23F17001A0A X-Stat-Signature: gq3kwtex7x3siboknortm9xm6zojw3ip Authentication-Results: imf02.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass (imf02.hostedemail.com: domain of wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com designates 45.249.212.255 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com X-HE-Tag: 1638253646-870903 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 2021/11/30 6:45, Dennis Zhou wrote: > On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 05:35:56PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote: >> With previous patch, we could add a generic pcpu first chunk >> allocation and free function to cleanup the duplicated definations >> on each architecture. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang >> --- >> arch/mips/mm/init.c | 16 +-------- >> arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c | 51 ++------------------------ >> arch/sparc/kernel/smp_64.c | 50 +------------------------- >> arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c | 59 +----------------------------- >> drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 19 +--------- >> include/linux/percpu.h | 9 +---- >> mm/percpu.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++--------------= -- >> 7 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 228 deletions(-) ... >> diff --git a/include/linux/percpu.h b/include/linux/percpu.h >> index 41bb54715b0c..d73c97ef4ff4 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/percpu.h >> +++ b/include/linux/percpu.h >> @@ -95,9 +95,6 @@ extern const char * const pcpu_fc_names[PCPU_FC_NR]; >> extern enum pcpu_fc pcpu_chosen_fc; >> =20 >> typedef int (pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t)(int cpu); >> -typedef void * (*pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t)(unsigned int cpu, size_t size, s= ize_t align, >> - pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn); >> -typedef void (*pcpu_fc_free_fn_t)(void *ptr, size_t size); >> typedef void (*pcpu_fc_populate_pte_fn_t)(unsigned long addr); >> typedef int (pcpu_fc_cpu_distance_fn_t)(unsigned int from, unsigned = int to); >> =20 >> @@ -112,15 +109,11 @@ extern void __init pcpu_setup_first_chunk(const = struct pcpu_alloc_info *ai, >> extern int __init pcpu_embed_first_chunk(size_t reserved_size, size_= t dyn_size, >> size_t atom_size, >> pcpu_fc_cpu_distance_fn_t cpu_distance_fn, >> - pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn, >> - pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t alloc_fn, >> - pcpu_fc_free_fn_t free_fn); >> + pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn); >> #endif >> =20 >> #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK >> extern int __init pcpu_page_first_chunk(size_t reserved_size, >> - pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t alloc_fn, >> - pcpu_fc_free_fn_t free_fn, >> pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn, >> pcpu_fc_populate_pte_fn_t populate_pte_fn); >> #endif >> diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c >> index 3f6cf1ff0be2..efaa1cbaf73d 100644 >> --- a/mm/percpu.c >> +++ b/mm/percpu.c >> @@ -2992,6 +2992,30 @@ static struct pcpu_alloc_info * __init __flatte= n pcpu_build_alloc_info( >> =20 >> return ai; >> } >> + >> +static void * __init pcpu_fc_alloc(unsigned int cpu, size_t size, siz= e_t align, >> + pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn) >> +{ >> + const unsigned long goal =3D __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS); >> + int node =3D NUMA_NO_NODE; >> + void *ptr; >> + >> + if (cpu_to_nd_fn) >> + node =3D cpu_to_nd_fn(cpu); >> + >> + if (node =3D=3D NUMA_NO_NODE || !node_online(node) || !NODE_DATA(nod= e)) { >> + ptr =3D memblock_alloc_from(size, align, goal); >> + } else { >> + ptr =3D memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, align, goal, >> + MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, node); >> + } >> + return ptr; >> +} > My preference here would be to keep this identical to the x86 > implementation where we #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA. I will add back '#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA',=C2=A0 also will add back the=20 pr_debug/pr_info part as x86 does, > Overall this makes sense. > > Thanks, > Dennis > .