From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: 21cnbao@gmail.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
jannh@google.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/madvise: initialize prev pointer in madvise_walk_vmas
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 09:54:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab78f4ee-dfa4-4c49-8944-a67546a739ca@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250617020544.57305-1-lance.yang@linux.dev>
On 17.06.25 04:05, Lance Yang wrote:
> From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
>
> The prev pointer was uninitialized, which could lead to undefined behavior
> where its address is taken and passed to the visit() callback without being
> assigned a value.
So, we are passing the pointer value to visit(), which is not undefined
behavior.
The issue would be if anybody takes a look at the value stored at that
pointer. Because, already passing an uninitialized value to a
(non-inlined) function is undefined behavior according to C.
In madvise_update_vma()->vma_modify_flags_name() we do exactly that,
correct?
vma = vma_modify_flags_name(&vmi, *prev, ...
We should use Fixes: then.
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>
> Initializing it to NULL makes the code safer and prevents potential bugs
> if a future callback function attempts to read from it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
> ---
> mm/madvise.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index 267d8e4adf31..c87325000303 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -1536,10 +1536,10 @@ int madvise_walk_vmas(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
> struct vm_area_struct **prev, unsigned long start,
> unsigned long end, void *arg))
> {
> + struct vm_area_struct *prev = NULL;
> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> - struct vm_area_struct *prev;
> - unsigned long tmp;
> int unmapped_error = 0;
> + unsigned long tmp;
> int error;
>
> /*
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-17 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-17 2:05 Lance Yang
2025-06-17 2:24 ` Barry Song
2025-06-17 4:57 ` Lance Yang
2025-06-17 5:19 ` Barry Song
2025-06-17 6:03 ` Lance Yang
2025-06-17 7:54 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-06-17 8:18 ` Lance Yang
2025-06-17 8:21 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-17 8:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17 8:34 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-17 8:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17 8:50 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-17 8:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17 8:43 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-17 8:51 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-17 8:26 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-17 8:50 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-17 9:21 ` Lance Yang
2025-06-17 9:26 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ab78f4ee-dfa4-4c49-8944-a67546a739ca@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox