linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Yuwei Guan <ssawgyw@gmail.com>,
	rppt@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tsahu@linux.ibm.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] memblock: Add flags and nid info in memblock debugfs
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 15:41:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab37a497-3caa-1313-90a8-328cfe99c8d3@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230518091431.299-1-ssawgyw@gmail.com>



On 5/18/23 14:44, Yuwei Guan wrote:
> Currently, the memblock debugfs can display the count of memblock_type and
> the base and end of the reg. However, when memblock_mark_*() or
> memblock_set_node() is executed on some range, the information in the
> existing debugfs cannot make it clear why the address is not consecutive.
> 
> For example,
> cat /sys/kernel/debug/memblock/memory
>    0: 0x0000000080000000..0x00000000901fffff
>    1: 0x0000000090200000..0x00000000905fffff
>    2: 0x0000000090600000..0x0000000092ffffff
>    3: 0x0000000093000000..0x00000000973fffff
>    4: 0x0000000097400000..0x00000000b71fffff
>    5: 0x00000000c0000000..0x00000000dfffffff
>    6: 0x00000000e2500000..0x00000000f87fffff
>    7: 0x00000000f8800000..0x00000000fa7fffff
>    8: 0x00000000fa800000..0x00000000fd3effff
>    9: 0x00000000fd3f0000..0x00000000fd3fefff
>   10: 0x00000000fd3ff000..0x00000000fd7fffff
>   11: 0x00000000fd800000..0x00000000fd901fff
>   12: 0x00000000fd902000..0x00000000fd909fff
>   13: 0x00000000fd90a000..0x00000000fd90bfff
>   14: 0x00000000fd90c000..0x00000000ffffffff
>   15: 0x0000000880000000..0x0000000affffffff
> 
> So we can add flags and nid to this debugfs.
> 
> For example,
> cat /sys/kernel/debug/memblock/memory
>    0: 0x0000000080000000..0x00000000901fffff     NONE    0
>    1: 0x0000000090200000..0x00000000905fffff    NOMAP    0
>    2: 0x0000000090600000..0x0000000092ffffff     NONE    0
>    3: 0x0000000093000000..0x00000000973fffff    NOMAP    0
>    4: 0x0000000097400000..0x00000000b71fffff     NONE    0
>    5: 0x00000000c0000000..0x00000000dfffffff     NONE    0
>    6: 0x00000000e2500000..0x00000000f87fffff     NONE    0
>    7: 0x00000000f8800000..0x00000000fa7fffff    NOMAP    0
>    8: 0x00000000fa800000..0x00000000fd3effff     NONE    0
>    9: 0x00000000fd3f0000..0x00000000fd3fefff    NOMAP    0
>   10: 0x00000000fd3ff000..0x00000000fd7fffff     NONE    0
>   11: 0x00000000fd800000..0x00000000fd901fff    NOMAP    0
>   12: 0x00000000fd902000..0x00000000fd909fff     NONE    0
>   13: 0x00000000fd90a000..0x00000000fd90bfff    NOMAP    0
>   14: 0x00000000fd90c000..0x00000000ffffffff     NONE    0
>   15: 0x0000000880000000..0x0000000affffffff     NONE    0

Although, Mike had suggested to keep these flags print last, above
format looks good as well.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Yuwei Guan <ssawgyw@gmail.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - show string value for each memblock flag
> ---
>  mm/memblock.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 511d4783dcf1..5fba53f98b2d 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -2143,13 +2143,23 @@ static int memblock_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, void *private)
>  	struct memblock_region *reg;
>  	int i;
>  	phys_addr_t end;
> +	static const char flagname[BITS_PER_LONG][8] = {
> +		[0 ... (BITS_PER_LONG-1)] = "?",

Minor nit -

Although checkpatch does not complain, should there be spaces between
the operator and operands e.g (BITS_PER_LONG - 1).

> +
> +		[ilog2(MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG)] = "HOTPLUG",
> +		[ilog2(MEMBLOCK_MIRROR)] = "MIRROR",
> +		[ilog2(MEMBLOCK_NOMAP)] = "NOMAP",
> +		[ilog2(MEMBLOCK_DRIVER_MANAGED)] = "DRV_MNG",
> +	};

Also, BITS_PER_LONG sized array is really required here ? as there are
just four available memblock flags.

>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < type->cnt; i++) {
>  		reg = &type->regions[i];
>  		end = reg->base + reg->size - 1;
>  
>  		seq_printf(m, "%4d: ", i);
> -		seq_printf(m, "%pa..%pa\n", &reg->base, &end);
> +		seq_printf(m, "%pa..%pa ", &reg->base, &end);
> +		seq_printf(m, "%8s ", reg->flags ? flagname[ilog2(reg->flags)] : "NONE");
> +		seq_printf(m, "%4d\n", memblock_get_region_node(reg));
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-18 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-18  9:14 Yuwei Guan
2023-05-18 10:11 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2023-05-18 14:05   ` Yuwei Guan
2023-05-19  7:34     ` Anshuman Khandual

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ab37a497-3caa-1313-90a8-328cfe99c8d3@arm.com \
    --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ssawgyw@gmail.com \
    --cc=tsahu@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox