From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Support dynamic (de)configuration of memory
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 18:11:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab366c03-8c78-449d-bfc4-2d155212d9d7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250926131527.3260733-1-sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
On 26.09.25 15:15, Sumanth Korikkar wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> Patchset provides a new interface for dynamic configuration and
> deconfiguration of hotplug memory on s390, allowing with/without
> memmap_on_memory support. It is a follow up on the discussion with David
> when introducing memmap_on_memory support for s390 and support dynamic
> (de)configuration of memory:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ee492da8-74b4-4a97-8b24-73e07257f01d@redhat.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241202082732.3959803-1-sumanthk@linux.ibm.com/
>
> The original motivation for introducing memmap_on_memory on s390 was to
> avoid using online memory to store struct pages metadata, particularly
> for standby memory blocks. This became critical in cases where there was
> an imbalance between standby and online memory, potentially leading to
> boot failures due to insufficient memory for metadata allocation.
>
> To address this, memmap_on_memory was utilized on s390. However, in its
> current form, it adds struct pages metadata at the start of each memory
> block at the time of addition (only standby memory), and this
> configuration is static. It cannot be changed at runtime (When the user
> needs continuous physical memory).
>
> Inorder to provide more flexibility to the user and overcome the above
> limitation, add an option to dynamically configure and deconfigure
> hotpluggable memory block with/without memmap_on_memory.
This will cleanly add/remove the memory, including the directmap and
other tracking data, so I like it.
>
> With the new interface, s390 will not add all possible hotplug memory in
> advance, like before, to make it visible in sysfs for online/offline
> actions. Instead, before memory block can be set online, it has to be
> configured via a new interface in /sys/firmware/memory/memoryX/config,
> which makes s390 similar to others. i.e. Adding of hotpluggable memory is
> controlled by the user instead of adding it at boottime.
Before I dig into the details, will onlining/offling still trigger
hypervisor action, or does that now really happen when memory is
added/removed?
That would be really nice, because it would remove the whole need for
"standby" memory, and having to treat hotplugged memory differently
under LPAR/z/VM than anywhere else (-> keep it offline).
>
> s390 kernel sysfs interface to configure/deconfigure memory with
> memmap_on_memory (with upcoming lsmem changes):
>
> * Initial memory layout:
> lsmem -o RANGE,SIZE,STATE,BLOCK,CONFIGURED,MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY
> RANGE SIZE STATE BLOCK CONFIGURED MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY
> 0x00000000-0x7fffffff 2G online 0-15 yes no
> 0x80000000-0xffffffff 2G offline 16-31 no yes
Could we instead modify "STATE" to reflect that it is "not added" / "not
configured" / "disabled" etc?
Like
lsmem -o RANGE,SIZE,STATE,BLOCK,MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY
RANGE SIZE STATE BLOCK
0x00000000-0x7fffffff 2G online 0-15
0x80000000-0xffffffff 2G disabled 16-31
Or is that an attempt to maintain backwards compatibility?
>
> * Configure memory
> echo 1 > /sys/firmware/memory/memory16/config
The granularity here is also memory_block_size_bytes(), correct?
> lsmem -o RANGE,SIZE,STATE,BLOCK,CONFIGURED,MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY
> RANGE SIZE STATE BLOCK CONFIGURED MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY
> 0x00000000-0x7fffffff 2G online 0-15 yes no
> 0x80000000-0x87ffffff 128M offline 16 yes yes
> 0x88000000-0xffffffff 1.9G offline 17-31 no yes
>
> * Deconfigure memory
> echo 0 > /sys/firmware/memory/memory16/config
> lsmem -o RANGE,SIZE,STATE,BLOCK,CONFIGURED,MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY
> RANGE SIZE STATE BLOCK CONFIGURED MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY
> 0x00000000-0x7fffffff 2G online 0-15 yes no
> 0x80000000-0xffffffff 2G offline 16-31 no yes
>
> * Enable memmap_on_memory and online it.
> (Deconfigure first)
> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory5/online
> echo 0 > /sys/firmware/memory/memory5/config
>
> lsmem -o RANGE,SIZE,STATE,BLOCK,CONFIGURED,MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY
> RANGE SIZE STATE BLOCK CONFIGURED MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY
> 0x00000000-0x27ffffff 640M online 0-4 yes no
> 0x28000000-0x2fffffff 128M offline 5 no no
> 0x30000000-0x7fffffff 1.3G online 6-15 yes no
> 0x80000000-0xffffffff 2G offline 16-31 no yes
>
> (Enable memmap_on_memory and online it)
> echo 1 > /sys/firmware/memory/memory5/memmap_on_memory
> echo 1 > /sys/firmware/memory/memory5/config
> echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory5/online
I guess the use for memmap_on_memory would now be limited to making
hotplug more likely to succeed in OOM scenarios.
>
> lsmem -o RANGE,SIZE,STATE,BLOCK,CONFIGURED,MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY
> RANGE SIZE STATE BLOCK CONFIGURED MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY
> 0x00000000-0x27ffffff 640M online 0-4 yes no
> 0x28000000-0x2fffffff 128M online 5 yes yes
> 0x30000000-0x7fffffff 1.3G online 6-15 yes no
> 0x80000000-0xffffffff 2G offline 16-31 no yes
>
> * Disable memmap_on_memory and online it.
> (Deconfigure first)
> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory5/online
> echo 0 > /sys/firmware/memory/memory5/config
>
> lsmem -o RANGE,SIZE,STATE,BLOCK,CONFIGURED,MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY
> RANGE SIZE STATE BLOCK CONFIGURED MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY
> 0x00000000-0x27ffffff 640M online 0-4 yes no
> 0x28000000-0x2fffffff 128M offline 5 no yes
> 0x30000000-0x7fffffff 1.3G online 6-15 yes no
> 0x80000000-0xffffffff 2G offline 16-31 no yes
>
> (Disable memmap_on_memory and online it)
> echo 0 > /sys/firmware/memory/memory5/memmap_on_memory
> echo 1 > /sys/firmware/memory/memory5/config
> echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory5/online
>
> lsmem -o RANGE,SIZE,STATE,BLOCK,CONFIGURED,MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY
> RANGE SIZE STATE BLOCK CONFIGURED MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY
> 0x00000000-0x7fffffff 2G online 0-15 yes no
> 0x80000000-0xffffffff 2G offline 16-31 no yes
>
> * Userspace changes:
> lsmem/chmem tool is also changed to use the new interface. I will send
> it to util-linux soon.
>
> Patch 1 adds support for removal of boot-allocated memory blocks.
>
> Patch 2 provides option to dynamically configure and deconfigure memory
> with/without memmap_on_memory.
>
> Patch 3 removes MHP_OFFLINE_INACCESSIBLE from s390. The mhp flag was
> used to mark memory as not accessible until memory hotplug online phase
> begins. However, with patch 2, it is no longer essential. Memory can be
> brought to accessible state before adding memory, as the memory is added
> during runttime now instead of boottime.
Nice.
>
> Patch 4 removes the MEM_PREPARE_ONLINE/MEM_FINISH_OFFLINE notifiers. It
> is no longer needed. Memory can be brought to accessible state before
> adding memory now, with runtime (de)configuration of memory.
Nice.
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-07 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-26 13:15 Sumanth Korikkar
2025-09-26 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] s390/mm: Support removal of boot-allocated virtual memory map Sumanth Korikkar
2025-09-26 13:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] s390/sclp: Add support for dynamic (de)configuration of memory Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-07 20:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-08 6:46 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-08 8:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-26 13:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] s390/sclp: Remove MHP_OFFLINE_INACCESSIBLE Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-07 19:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-26 13:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Remove MEM_PREPARE_ONLINE/MEM_FINISH_OFFLINE notifiers Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-07 14:30 ` [PATCH 0/4] Support dynamic (de)configuration of memory Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-07 16:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-07 16:11 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-10-07 17:56 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-07 19:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-08 6:05 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-08 8:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-08 9:12 ` Heiko Carstens
2025-10-08 9:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-08 9:13 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-08 9:33 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ab366c03-8c78-449d-bfc4-2d155212d9d7@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox