Re: [PATCH] mm: migrate: requeue destination folio on deferred split queue

["David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>]

On 3/6/26 14:35, Usama Arif wrote:
> During folio migration, __folio_migrate_mapping() removes the source
> folio from the deferred split queue, but the destination folio is never
> re-queued.  This causes underutilized THPs to escape the shrinker after
> NUMA migration, since they silently drop off the deferred split list.
> 
> Fix this by calling deferred_split_folio() on the destination folio
> after a successful migration, for large rmappable folios.
> 
> Reported-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Fixes: dafff3f4c850 ("mm: split underused THPs")
> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
> ---
>  mm/migrate.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index ece77ccb2ec0..98d0a594f7b7 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -1393,6 +1393,17 @@ static int migrate_folio_move(free_folio_t put_new_folio, unsigned long private,
>  	if (old_page_state & PAGE_WAS_MAPPED)
>  		remove_migration_ptes(src, dst, 0);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Requeue the destination folio on the deferred split queue if
> +	 * the source was a large folio that was on the queue. Without
> +	 * this, NUMA migration causes underutilized THPs to escape
> +	 * the shrinker since the source is unqueued in
> +	 * __folio_migrate_mapping() and the destination is never
> +	 * re-queued.
> +	 */
> +	if (folio_test_large(dst) && folio_test_large_rmappable(dst))
> +		deferred_split_folio(dst, false);

Doesn't that mean that you will readd any large folios, even if already
previously taken off the list after scanning?

So I am not sure if your "if the source was a large folio that was on
the queue." comment is accurate?

-- 
Cheers,

David