From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_reporting: the "page" must not be the list head
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:05:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaa56d83-2444-d74e-025a-508a2be6b772@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa97519b-a860-5fea-9511-2237f195caeb@redhat.com>
On 8/17/2020 2:35 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 17.08.20 10:48, Wei Yang wrote:
>> If "page" is the list head, list_for_each_entry_safe() would stop
>> iteration.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> mm/page_reporting.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/page_reporting.c b/mm/page_reporting.c
>> index 3bbd471cfc81..aaaa3605123d 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_reporting.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_reporting.c
>> @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ page_reporting_cycle(struct page_reporting_dev_info *prdev, struct zone *zone,
>> * the new head of the free list before we release the
>> * zone lock.
>> */
>> - if (&page->lru != list && !list_is_first(&page->lru, list))
>> + if (!list_is_first(&page->lru, list))
>> list_rotate_to_front(&page->lru, list);
>>
>> /* release lock before waiting on report processing */
>>
>
> Is this a fix or a cleanup? If it's a fix, can this be reproduced easily
> and what ere the effects?
>
This should be a clean-up. Since the &page->lru != list will always be true.
If I recall at some point the that was a check for &next->lru != list
but I think I pulled out an additional conditional check somewhere so
that we just go through the start of the loop again and iterate over
reported pages until we are guaranteed to have a non-reported page to
rotate to the top of the list with the general idea being that we wanted
the allocator to pull non-reported pages before reported pages.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-17 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-17 8:48 Wei Yang
2020-08-17 9:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-17 16:05 ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2020-08-17 17:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-18 3:05 ` Wei Yang
2020-08-18 7:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-18 8:41 ` Wei Yang
2020-08-18 3:22 ` Wei Yang
2020-08-18 14:58 ` Alexander Duyck
2020-08-18 3:03 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aaa56d83-2444-d74e-025a-508a2be6b772@linux.intel.com \
--to=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox