From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: memcg: separate slab stat accounting from objcg charge cache
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 14:20:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaYNDbFZ2AHM7gKt@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260302195305.620713-6-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
On Mon, Mar 02, 2026 at 02:50:18PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Cgroup slab metrics are cached per-cpu the same way as the sub-page
> charge cache. However, the intertwined code to manage those dependent
> caches right now is quite difficult to follow.
>
> Specifically, cached slab stat updates occur in consume() if there was
> enough charge cache to satisfy the new object. If that fails, whole
> pages are reserved, and slab stats are updated when the remainder of
> those pages, after subtracting the size of the new slab object, are
> put into the charge cache. This already juggles a delicate mix of the
> object size, the page charge size, and the remainder to put into the
> byte cache. Doing slab accounting in this path as well is fragile, and
> has recently caused a bug where the input parameters between the two
> caches were mixed up.
>
> Refactor the consume() and refill() paths into unlocked and locked
> variants that only do charge caching. Then let the slab path manage
> its own lock section and open-code charging and accounting.
>
> This makes the slab stat cache subordinate to the charge cache:
> __refill_obj_stock() is called first to prepare it;
> __account_obj_stock() follows to hitch a ride.
>
> This results in a minor behavioral change: previously, a mismatching
> percpu stock would always be drained for the purpose of setting up
> slab account caching, even if there was no byte remainder to put into
> the charge cache. Now, the stock is left alone, and slab accounting
> takes the uncached path if there is a mismatch. This is exceedingly
> rare, and it was probably never worth draining the whole stock just to
> cache the slab stat update.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Thanks, this looks much better.
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-02 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-02 19:50 [PATCH 0/5]: memcg: obj stock and slab stat caching cleanups Johannes Weiner
2026-03-02 19:50 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm: memcg: factor out trylock_stock() and unlock_stock() Johannes Weiner
2026-03-02 21:43 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-03-02 19:50 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: memcg: simplify objcg charge size and stock remainder math Johannes Weiner
2026-03-02 21:44 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-03-02 19:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm: memcontrol: split out __obj_cgroup_charge() Johannes Weiner
2026-03-02 21:45 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-03-02 19:50 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm: memcontrol: use __account_obj_stock() in the !locked path Johannes Weiner
2026-03-02 21:50 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-03-02 19:50 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: memcg: separate slab stat accounting from objcg charge cache Johannes Weiner
2026-03-02 22:20 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aaYNDbFZ2AHM7gKt@linux.dev \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox