linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
	Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Regression] mm:slab/sheaves: severe performance regression in cross-CPU slab allocation
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 17:23:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaFinIsCmitHSP_c@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c6a01f7e-c6eb-454b-9b9e-734526dd659d@kernel.org>

On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 07:02:11PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
> On 2/25/26 10:31, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Hi Vlastimil,
> > 
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 09:45:03AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
> >> On 2/24/26 21:27, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > It made sense to me not to refill sheaves when we can't reclaim, but I
> >> > didn't anticipate this interaction with mempools. We could change them
> >> > but there might be others using a similar pattern. Maybe it would be for
> >> > the best to just drop that heuristic from __pcs_replace_empty_main()
> >> > (but carefully as some deadlock avoidance depends on it, we might need
> >> > to e.g. replace it with gfpflags_allow_spinning()). I'll send a patch
> >> > tomorrow to test this theory, unless someone beats me to it (feel free to).
> >> Could you try this then, please? Thanks!
> > 
> > Thanks for working on this issue!
> > 
> > Unfortunately the patch doesn't make a difference on IOPS in the perf test,
> > follows the collected perf profile on linus tree(basically 7.0-rc1 with your patch):
> 
> what about this patch in addition to the previous one? Thanks.

With the two patches, IOPS increases to 22M from 13M, but still much less than
36M which is obtained in v6.19-rc5, and slab-sheave PR follows v6.19-rc5.

Also alloc_slowpath can't be observed any more.

Follows perf profile with the two patches:


-    8.30%     0.19%  io_uring         [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] mempool_alloc_noprof
   - 8.11% mempool_alloc_noprof
      - 7.64% kmem_cache_alloc_noprof
         - 6.15% __pcs_replace_empty_main
            - 5.96% refill_sheaf
               + 5.95% refill_objects
+    8.06%     0.44%  io_uring         [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] kmem_cache_alloc_noprof
+    7.44%     0.00%  kublk            [ublk_drv]                      [k] 0xffffffffc140c71b
+    6.63%     0.03%  kublk            [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] __io_run_local_work
+    6.19%     0.05%  io_uring         [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] __pcs_replace_empty_main
-    5.97%     0.01%  io_uring         [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] refill_sheaf
   - 5.96% refill_sheaf
      - 5.95% refill_objects
         - 4.87% __refill_objects_any
            - 4.76% __refill_objects_node
                 0.72% __slab_free
         - 1.00% allocate_slab
            - 0.80% __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof
               - 0.79% get_page_from_freelist
                  + 0.72% post_alloc_hook
+    5.96%     0.02%  io_uring         [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] refill_objects


thanks,
Ming



      reply	other threads:[~2026-02-27  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-24  2:52 Ming Lei
2026-02-24  5:00 ` Harry Yoo
2026-02-24  9:07   ` Ming Lei
2026-02-25  5:32     ` Hao Li
2026-02-25  6:54       ` Harry Yoo
2026-02-25  7:06         ` Hao Li
2026-02-25  7:19           ` Harry Yoo
2026-02-25  8:19             ` Hao Li
2026-02-25  8:41               ` Harry Yoo
2026-02-25  8:54                 ` Hao Li
2026-02-25  8:21             ` Harry Yoo
2026-02-24  6:51 ` Hao Li
2026-02-24  7:10   ` Harry Yoo
2026-02-24  7:41     ` Hao Li
2026-02-24 20:27 ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-02-25  5:24   ` Harry Yoo
2026-02-25  8:45   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-02-25  9:31     ` Ming Lei
2026-02-25 11:29       ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-02-25 12:24         ` Ming Lei
2026-02-25 13:22           ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-02-26 18:02       ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-02-27  9:23         ` Ming Lei [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aaFinIsCmitHSP_c@fedora \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox