From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25FAFC43461 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 11:34:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E5E611BD for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 11:34:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A8E5E611BD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 0C9BE6B00D5; Tue, 18 May 2021 07:34:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 07A506B00D6; Tue, 18 May 2021 07:34:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E5DF58D0001; Tue, 18 May 2021 07:34:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0085.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.85]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39C76B00D5 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 07:34:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin22.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474B5A74E for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 11:34:11 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78154143102.22.24A3620 Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by imf13.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E681E000109 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 11:34:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D915ABC2; Tue, 18 May 2021 11:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm, slub: change run-time assertion in kmalloc_index() to compile-time To: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> Cc: Nathan Chancellor , akpm@linux-foundation.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, rientjes@google.com, penberg@kernel.org, cl@linux.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, naresh.kamboju@linaro.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, arnd@arndb.de, Marco Elver References: <20210511173448.GA54466@hyeyoo> <20210515210950.GA52841@hyeyoo> <41c65455-a35b-3ad3-54f9-49ca7105bfa9@suse.cz> <20210518003859.GC80297@hyeyoo> <71416382-2e4c-5e03-df9c-265fda41c2de@suse.cz> <20210518111814.GA114501@hyeyoo> From: Vlastimil Babka Message-ID: Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 13:34:07 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210518111814.GA114501@hyeyoo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1E681E000109 Authentication-Results: imf13.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf13.hostedemail.com: domain of vbabka@suse.cz designates 195.135.220.15 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=vbabka@suse.cz X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Stat-Signature: 33s8wbt9xikcdngyurp7tuyz4yady4pp X-HE-Tag: 1621337646-790860 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 5/18/21 1:18 PM, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:28:17AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> On 5/18/21 2:43 AM, Nathan Chancellor wrote: >> > On 5/17/2021 5:38 PM, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote: >> >> On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 11:34:49PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: >> >>> This should work I think: >> >> >> >> compiled well with clang-10.0.1, clang-11.0.0, >> >> and gcc-10.2.0 with x86_64 default config. >> >> >> >> is the condition CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION > 110000, >> >> not including 110000 it self? >> >> Good spot. > > Thanks! > >> > Ah sorry, that should definitely be >= :( >> > >> > That is what I get for writing an email that late... in reality, it probably >> > won't matter due to the availability of 11.0.1 and 11.1.0 but it should >> > absolutely be changed. >> > >> > I have not given Nick's patch a go yet but would something like this be >> > acceptable? >> >> Yes. > > You mean Nick's patch to added with Nathan's code? No, I thought Nathan was asking about his own proposal. I don't think Nick's patch that adds 26 index solves the issue. Nathan's proposal fixed with '>=' is OK. > I'm not sure we need this, but will add it if you can accept it. > > I'll send fixup patch soon. tell me if I can improve > anything on it. > > Thanks, > Hyeonggon >