RE: amusing SLUB compaction bug when CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE

[David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>]

From: Hugh Dickins
> Sent: 30 September 2022 17:22
> 
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2022, David Laight wrote:
> > > > > Regarding "conflicting" alignment requests: yes, I agree with you,
> > > > > it would have to be a toolchain bug if when asked to align 2 and to
> > > > > align 4, it chose not to align 4.
> >
> > See https://godbolt.org/z/3nGsTaf5e
> > the align() directive takes precedence.
> >
> > Here you only want to ensure the alignment is at least 4.
> 
> Sorry, I don't understand the point you are making,
> nor how to deduce it from the link which you give:
> I'll leave it to those who understand better.

(I've copied Kees Cook - I think it is his patches that are
increasing the function alignment.
He'll need to find the thread history...)

IIRC -malign_functions is being used to put functions onto
16 byte boundaries to get aligned pad space before the function.
Adding __align(4) overrides this and (I think) will remove
the pad space.

I could only see the alignment directives in gcc ouput.
clang didn't seem to generate them.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)