linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 24/29] arch, mm: consolidate initialization of SPARSE memory model
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 21:40:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZytSwzGj24lqkLU@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260223144108-dcace0b9-02e8-4b67-a7ce-f263bed36f26@linutronix.de>

Hi Thomas,

On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 02:52:45PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 10:20:58AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Every architecture calls sparse_init() during setup_arch() although the
> > data structures created by sparse_init() are not used until the
> > initialization of the core MM.
> > 
> > Beside the code duplication, calling sparse_init() from architecture
> > specific code causes ordering differences of vmemmap and HVO initialization
> > on different architectures.
> > 
> > Move the call to sparse_init() from architecture specific code to
> > free_area_init() to ensure that vmemmap and HVO initialization order is
> > always the same.
> 
> This broke the boot on RISC-V 32-bit (rv32_defconfig) for me.
> 
> Specifically if sparse_init() is *not* called before the following callchain,
> the kernel dies at that point.
> 
> start_kernel()
>   setup_arch()
>     apply_boot_alternatives()
>       _apply_alternatives()
>         riscv_cpufeature_patch_func()
>           patch_text_nosync()
>           riscv_alternative_fix_offsets()

Hm, most architectures do alternatives patching much later in the boot,
when much more subsystems (including mm) is already initialized.

Any particular reason riscv does it that early? 
 
> Simple reproducer, using kunit:
> 
> ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --raw_output=all --make_options LLVM=1 --arch riscv32 --kconfig_add CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_MANUAL=y --kconfig_add CONFIG_SPARSEMEM=y

Looking at patch_map it's quite clear why movement of sparse_init() cased a
crash:

	if (core_kernel_text(uintaddr) || is_kernel_exittext(uintaddr))
		page = phys_to_page(__pa_symbol(addr));

phys_to_page() with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM=y will try to access memory section
that are initialized in sparse_init().

What I don't understand is why patch_map() needs a struct page for kernel
text patching at all, __pa_symbol() should work just fine.
And the BUG_ON(!page) is completely bogus for phys_to_page() conversion,
because that one is pure arithmetics.

If moving apply_boot_alternatives() is not an option for riscv, something
like the patch below should fix the issue with access to nonexistent
memory sections. But I think moving apply_boot_alternatives() later in boot
would make things less fragile.

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
index db13c9ddf9e3..89b3c13f2865 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
@@ -43,18 +43,19 @@ static __always_inline void *patch_map(void *addr, const unsigned int fixmap)
 {
 	uintptr_t uintaddr = (uintptr_t) addr;
 	struct page *page;
+	phys_addr_t phys;
 
-	if (core_kernel_text(uintaddr) || is_kernel_exittext(uintaddr))
-		page = phys_to_page(__pa_symbol(addr));
-	else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX))
+	if (core_kernel_text(uintaddr) || is_kernel_exittext(uintaddr)) {
+		phys = __pa_symbol(addr);
+	} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX)) {
 		page = vmalloc_to_page(addr);
-	else
+		BUG_ON(!page);
+		phys = page_to_phys(page);
+	} else {
 		return addr;
+	}
 
-	BUG_ON(!page);
-
-	return (void *)set_fixmap_offset(fixmap, page_to_phys(page) +
-					 offset_in_page(addr));
+	return (void *)set_fixmap_offset(fixmap, phys + offset_in_page(addr));
 }
 
 static void patch_unmap(int fixmap)

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-23 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-11  8:20 [PATCH v3 00/29] arch, mm: consolidate hugetlb early reservation Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 01/29] alpha: introduce arch_zone_limits_init() Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 02/29] arc: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 03/29] arm: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 04/29] arm: make initialization of zero page independent of the memory map Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 05/29] arm64: introduce arch_zone_limits_init() Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 06/29] csky: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 07/29] hexagon: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 08/29] loongarch: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 09/29] m68k: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 10/29] microblaze: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 11/29] mips: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 12/29] nios2: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 13/29] openrisc: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 14/29] parisc: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 15/29] powerpc: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-13 12:29   ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 16/29] riscv: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 17/29] s390: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-12  7:02   ` Alexander Gordeev
2026-01-12  7:34     ` Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 18/29] sh: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 19/29] sparc: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-13 12:28   ` Andreas Larsson
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 20/29] um: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 21/29] x86: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 22/29] xtensa: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 23/29] arch, mm: consolidate initialization of nodes, zones and memory map Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 24/29] arch, mm: consolidate initialization of SPARSE memory model Mike Rapoport
2026-02-23 13:52   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-23 19:40     ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2026-01-11  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 25/29] mips: drop paging_init() Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:21 ` [PATCH v3 26/29] x86: don't reserve hugetlb memory in setup_arch() Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:21 ` [PATCH v3 27/29] mm, arch: consolidate hugetlb CMA reservation Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:21 ` [PATCH v3 28/29] mm/hugetlb: drop hugetlb_cma_check() Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11  8:21 ` [PATCH v3 29/29] Revert "mm/hugetlb: deal with multiple calls to hugetlb_bootmem_alloc" Mike Rapoport
2026-01-12 22:23 ` [PATCH v3 00/29] arch, mm: consolidate hugetlb early reservation Andrew Morton
2026-01-13  6:50   ` Kalle Niemi
2026-01-13  8:40     ` Kalle Niemi
2026-02-20  4:10 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aZytSwzGj24lqkLU@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox