From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 24/29] arch, mm: consolidate initialization of SPARSE memory model
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 21:40:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZytSwzGj24lqkLU@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260223144108-dcace0b9-02e8-4b67-a7ce-f263bed36f26@linutronix.de>
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 02:52:45PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 10:20:58AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Every architecture calls sparse_init() during setup_arch() although the
> > data structures created by sparse_init() are not used until the
> > initialization of the core MM.
> >
> > Beside the code duplication, calling sparse_init() from architecture
> > specific code causes ordering differences of vmemmap and HVO initialization
> > on different architectures.
> >
> > Move the call to sparse_init() from architecture specific code to
> > free_area_init() to ensure that vmemmap and HVO initialization order is
> > always the same.
>
> This broke the boot on RISC-V 32-bit (rv32_defconfig) for me.
>
> Specifically if sparse_init() is *not* called before the following callchain,
> the kernel dies at that point.
>
> start_kernel()
> setup_arch()
> apply_boot_alternatives()
> _apply_alternatives()
> riscv_cpufeature_patch_func()
> patch_text_nosync()
> riscv_alternative_fix_offsets()
Hm, most architectures do alternatives patching much later in the boot,
when much more subsystems (including mm) is already initialized.
Any particular reason riscv does it that early?
> Simple reproducer, using kunit:
>
> ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --raw_output=all --make_options LLVM=1 --arch riscv32 --kconfig_add CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_MANUAL=y --kconfig_add CONFIG_SPARSEMEM=y
Looking at patch_map it's quite clear why movement of sparse_init() cased a
crash:
if (core_kernel_text(uintaddr) || is_kernel_exittext(uintaddr))
page = phys_to_page(__pa_symbol(addr));
phys_to_page() with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM=y will try to access memory section
that are initialized in sparse_init().
What I don't understand is why patch_map() needs a struct page for kernel
text patching at all, __pa_symbol() should work just fine.
And the BUG_ON(!page) is completely bogus for phys_to_page() conversion,
because that one is pure arithmetics.
If moving apply_boot_alternatives() is not an option for riscv, something
like the patch below should fix the issue with access to nonexistent
memory sections. But I think moving apply_boot_alternatives() later in boot
would make things less fragile.
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
index db13c9ddf9e3..89b3c13f2865 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
@@ -43,18 +43,19 @@ static __always_inline void *patch_map(void *addr, const unsigned int fixmap)
{
uintptr_t uintaddr = (uintptr_t) addr;
struct page *page;
+ phys_addr_t phys;
- if (core_kernel_text(uintaddr) || is_kernel_exittext(uintaddr))
- page = phys_to_page(__pa_symbol(addr));
- else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX))
+ if (core_kernel_text(uintaddr) || is_kernel_exittext(uintaddr)) {
+ phys = __pa_symbol(addr);
+ } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX)) {
page = vmalloc_to_page(addr);
- else
+ BUG_ON(!page);
+ phys = page_to_phys(page);
+ } else {
return addr;
+ }
- BUG_ON(!page);
-
- return (void *)set_fixmap_offset(fixmap, page_to_phys(page) +
- offset_in_page(addr));
+ return (void *)set_fixmap_offset(fixmap, phys + offset_in_page(addr));
}
static void patch_unmap(int fixmap)
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-23 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-11 8:20 [PATCH v3 00/29] arch, mm: consolidate hugetlb early reservation Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 01/29] alpha: introduce arch_zone_limits_init() Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 02/29] arc: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 03/29] arm: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 04/29] arm: make initialization of zero page independent of the memory map Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 05/29] arm64: introduce arch_zone_limits_init() Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 06/29] csky: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 07/29] hexagon: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 08/29] loongarch: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 09/29] m68k: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 10/29] microblaze: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 11/29] mips: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 12/29] nios2: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 13/29] openrisc: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 14/29] parisc: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 15/29] powerpc: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-13 12:29 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 16/29] riscv: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 17/29] s390: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-12 7:02 ` Alexander Gordeev
2026-01-12 7:34 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 18/29] sh: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 19/29] sparc: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-13 12:28 ` Andreas Larsson
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 20/29] um: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 21/29] x86: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 22/29] xtensa: " Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 23/29] arch, mm: consolidate initialization of nodes, zones and memory map Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 24/29] arch, mm: consolidate initialization of SPARSE memory model Mike Rapoport
2026-02-23 13:52 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-23 19:40 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2026-01-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 25/29] mips: drop paging_init() Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:21 ` [PATCH v3 26/29] x86: don't reserve hugetlb memory in setup_arch() Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:21 ` [PATCH v3 27/29] mm, arch: consolidate hugetlb CMA reservation Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:21 ` [PATCH v3 28/29] mm/hugetlb: drop hugetlb_cma_check() Mike Rapoport
2026-01-11 8:21 ` [PATCH v3 29/29] Revert "mm/hugetlb: deal with multiple calls to hugetlb_bootmem_alloc" Mike Rapoport
2026-01-12 22:23 ` [PATCH v3 00/29] arch, mm: consolidate hugetlb early reservation Andrew Morton
2026-01-13 6:50 ` Kalle Niemi
2026-01-13 8:40 ` Kalle Niemi
2026-02-20 4:10 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZytSwzGj24lqkLU@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox