linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>,
	SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	zkabelac@redhat.com, Matthew Sakai <msakai@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: allow __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL in vmalloc
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 11:02:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZykWyxLy34o7PKr@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff48283b-be21-7f9a-d616-e303a4a1ebe6@redhat.com>

On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 05:33:30PM +0100, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> The commit 07003531e03c8 ("mm/vmalloc: warn on invalid vmalloc gfp
> flags") breaks the device mapper VDO target. The VDO target calls vmalloc
> with __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL and this flag is not in the mask of allowed
> flags.
> 
> There is no reason why vmalloc couldn't support __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL, so 
> let's add this flag to GFP_VMALLOC_SUPPORTED.

My only skepticism about this comes from the line in the
vmalloc_node_range() doc: 
"and %__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL are not supported."

I myself don't know why that may be. Could you elaborate on if/why the
doc is wrong please?

> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
> Fixes: 07003531e03c ("mm/vmalloc: warn on invalid vmalloc gfp flags")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org	# v6.19
> 
> ---
>  mm/vmalloc.c |    1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/vmalloc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -3928,6 +3928,7 @@ fail:
>   */
>  #define GFP_VMALLOC_SUPPORTED (GFP_KERNEL | GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_NOWAIT |\
>  				__GFP_NOFAIL |  __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_NORETRY |\
> +				__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL |\
>  				GFP_NOFS | GFP_NOIO | GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT |\
>  				GFP_USER | __GFP_NOLOCKDEP)
>  
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-23 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-12 16:33 Mikulas Patocka
2026-02-21  1:19 ` SeongJae Park
2026-02-23  5:48   ` Anshuman Khandual
2026-02-23 19:02 ` Vishal Moola (Oracle) [this message]
2026-02-23 19:25   ` Mikulas Patocka
2026-02-23 20:07     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2026-02-23 22:08     ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aZykWyxLy34o7PKr@fedora \
    --to=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=msakai@redhat.com \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=zkabelac@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox